Martine Kruijtbosch

163 Mo ra l case de l i be ra t i on 20. Spijkerboer RP, Van der Stel JC, Widdershoven GAM, Molewijk AC. Does moral case deliberation help professionals in Care for the Homeless in dealing with their dilemmas? A mixed-methods responsive study. HEC Forum 2017;29:21-41. 21. Wingfield J, Bissel, P, Anderson C. The scope of pharmacy ethics—an evaluation of the international research literature, 1990–2002. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:2383-2396. 22. Wingfield J, Badcott D. The professional decision-making process. In: Wingfield J, Badcott D, eds. Pharmacy Ethics and Decision Making . London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2007: 95-112. 23. Bolt I, van den Hoven M, Blom L , Bouvy ML. To dispense or not to dispense? Ethical case decision-making in pharmacy practice. Int J Clin Pharm 2015;37:978–981. 24. Chaar B. Decisions, decisions: Ethical dilemmas in practice (or how to pass the 'Red face test’). Australian pharmacist 2006;25:444–449. https://flexiblelearning.auckland.ac.nz/pharmacy- legislation/module4/menu/1/files/decisions_betty_chaar.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2020. 25. Allinson MD, Black P. Students views of an online ethical decision-support tool. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2018;10:226-230. 26. Mantzourani E, Desselle S, Le J, Lonie JM, Lucas C. The role of reflective practice in healthcare professions: Next steps for pharmacy education and practice. Res Soc Adm Pharm 2019;15:1476- 1479. 27. Casey D, Houghton C. Clarifying case study research: Examples from practice. Nurse researcher 2010;17:41-51. 28. Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2018. 29. Koster ES, Blom L, Philbert D, Rump W, Bouvy ML. The Utrecht Pharmacy Practice network for Education and Research: a network of community and hospital pharmacies in the Netherlands. Int J Clin Pharm 2014;36:669-674. 30. Verkerk MA, De Bree MJ, Mourits MJ. Reflective professionalism: interpreting CanMEDS’ “professionalism”. J Med Ethics 2007;33:663-666. 31. Irvine DH. Time for hard decisions on patient‐centred professionalism. Med J Aust 2004;181:271- 274. 32. Inguaggiato G, Metselaar S, Porz R, Widdershoven G. A pragmatist approach to clinical ethics support: overcoming the perils of ethical pluralism. Med Health Care Philos 2019;22:427–438. 33. Abma TA, Molewijk B, Widdershoven GA. Good care in ongoing dialogue. Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Anal 2009;17:217-235. 34. Gadamer, H. Truth and method. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2019:370-387. 35. Stolper M, Molewijk B, Widdershoven G. Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitator of moral case deliberation. HEC Forum 2015;27:47-59. 36. De Bree M, Veening E. Het zevenfasenmodel – over wat u verder moet weten en kunnen om goed gebruik te kunnen maken van een methodiek. In: Van Dartel H, Molewijk B, eds. In gesprek blijven over goede zorg. Overlegmethoden voor ethiek in de praktijk. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom; 2014: 65-77.