Stefan Elbers

47 Evaluating IMPT programmes over time Table 2. Continued. Cohort Treatment modalities Healthcare providers Type of contact (group size) Time span (wks) Duration (hours) Level of tailoring follow up? phy psy pt ot nur swo Roche- Leboucher (2011) ex, re, wo, te, oth X X - X - - group (6-8) 5 150 low no Semrau (2015) ed, ex, re, sm, oth X X X - - X mixed (NA) 3 48 low no Silvemark (2014) ed, ex, bt, re, sm, ba X X X X X X group (6-9) 5 175 low no Smeets (2008): a ed, ga, bt, oth X X X X - X group 10 24 low no Smeets (2008): b ed, ex, ga, bt, oth X X X X - X group 10 77 low no Spinhoven (2004) ed, ga, bt, sm, oth - X X X - - mixed 8 150 low no Stein (2013) ed, ex, bt, re, sm, ba, te, oth X X X X - - group (6-8) 6 90 low no Steinmetz (2019) ex, re, ph, oth X X X - - - NA 2 15 high no Strobel (1998) ed, ex, ga, re, sm, ba, oth X X X - X - group (6) 5 150 low no Tavafian (2011) ed, ex, bt, re, sm, ph, oth - X X - - - group (NA) 1 9 low yes Thieme (2003) ed, ex, bt, sm X X X - X - group (5-7) 5 75 low no Van der Maas (2015): a ed, ex, ga, bt, re, oth X X X X - - group (4-6) 12 94 low yes Van der Maas (2015): b ed, ex, ga, bt, re, ba, oth X X X X - - group (4-6) 12 109 low yes van Hooff (2010) ed, ex, bt, re, sm - X X X - - group (NA) 2 100 low no van Wilgen (2009) ed, ex, ga, bt, re, sm, oth X X X - - - mixed (NA) 7 NA high no Vendrig (2000) ed, ex, ga, ph, wo - X X - - - group (NA) 4 NA low no Verkerk (2011) ed, ex, re, sm, ba X X X - - - group (6) 9 48 low yes Volker (2017) ed, ex, bt, re X X X X - X mixed (NA) 15 NA low no