Stefan Elbers

77 Living systematic reviews in rehabilitation science Millard, T., Synnot, A., Elliott, J., Green, S., McDonald, S., & Turner, T. (2019). Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation. Syst Rev, 8 (1), 325. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13643-019-1248-5 Morley, S., Williams, A., & Eccleston, C. (2013). Examining the evidence about psychological treatments for chronic pain: Time for a paradigm shift? Pain , 154 (10), 1929-1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.049 Negrini, S., Armijo-Olivo, S., Patrini, M., Frontera, W. R., Heinemann, A. W., Machalicek, W., Whyte, J., & Arienti, C. (2020). The randomized controlled trials rehabilitation checklist: Methodology of development of a reporting guideline specific to rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil , 99 (3), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1097/ PHM.0000000000001370 Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev , 5 (1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 Pollock, A., & van Wijck, F. (2019). Cochrane overviews: how can we optimize their impact on evidence-based rehabilitation? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med , 55 , 395-410. https://10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05780-0 Probst, P., Hüttner, F. J., Meydan, Ö., Kalkum, E., Kretschmer, R., Jensen, K., Kenngott, H. G., Mihaljevic, A. L., Thilo, H., & Büchler, M. W. (2019). Evidence map of pancreatic surgery: protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open , 9 (9), e032353. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032353 Rombey, T., Lochner, V., Puljak, L., Könsgen, N., Mathes, T., & Pieper, D. (2020). Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non-Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study. Res Synt Meth , 11 (3), 471-483. https://doi-org.ezproxy.ub.unimaas.nl/10.1002/jrsm.1409 Rowbotham, M. C., Gilron, I., Glazer, C., Rice, A. S., Smith, B. H., Stewart, W. F., & Wasan, A. D. (2013). Can pragmatic trials help us better understand chronic pain and improve treatment? Pain , 154 (5), 643-646. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.034 Salvador-Oliván, J. A., Marco-Cuenca, G., & Arquero-Avilés, R. (2019). Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval. J Med Lib Ass, 107 (2), 210. https://10.5195/jmla.2019.567 Schmidt, L., Olorisade, B. K., McGuinness, L. A., Thomas, J., & Higgins, J. P. (2020). Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi) automation: A living review protocol. F1000Res , 9 . https://10.12688/ f1000research.22781.2 Shojania, K. G., Sampson, M., Ansari, M. T., Ji, J., Doucette, S., & Moher, D. (2007). How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Int Med , 147 (4), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-4- 200708210-00179 Simmonds, M., Salanti, G., McKenzie, J., Elliott, J., Agoritsas, T., Hilton, J., Perron, C., Akl, E., Hodder, R., & Pestridge, C. (2017). Living systematic reviews: 3. Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses. Journal Clin Epidem , 91 , 38-46. https://10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.008 Smeets, R. J. (2021). How to sustain and improve client centred (matched) care in chronic musculoskeletal pain? Start by changing the way policy makers select and judge the large amount of available data, and get rid of the dogma of stepped care. Eur J Phys , 23 (2), 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2021.1888469 Stevens, K. R. (2001). Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice. AACN Adv Crit Care, 12 (4), 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1097/00044067-200111000-00009 Thomas, J., Noel-Storr, A., Marshall, I., Wallace, B., McDonald, S., Mavergames, C., Glasziou, P., Shemilt, I., Synnot, A., & Turner, T. (2017). Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. J Clin Epidem , 91 , 31-37. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.011 Tugwell, P., Welch, V. A., Karunananthan, S., Maxwell, L. J., Akl, E. A., Avey, M. T., Bhutta, Z. A., Brouwers, M. C., Clark, J. P., & Cook, S. (2020). When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist. Bmj , 370 . https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.m2864