7 General discussion and summary 165 References 1. Nederlandse Internisten Vereniging (Dutch Association of Internal Medicine). Verstandige keuzes bij interne geneeskunde (Wise Choices in Internal Medicine). 2014. Verstandige keuzes bij interne geneeskunde. Available from: https://www.internisten.nl/werkenals-internist/beroepsinformatie-divers/publicaties/verstandige-keuzes-bij-internegeneeskunde 2. Mockford C, Fritz Z, George R, Court R, Grove A, Clarke B, et al. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation. Vol. 88, Resuscitation. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2015. p. 99–113. 3. Jimenez G, Tan WS, Virk AK, Low CK, Car J, Ho AHY. Overview of Systematic Reviews of Advance Care Planning: Summary of Evidence and Global Lessons. J Pain Symptom Manage [Internet]. 2018;56(3):436-459.e25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpainsymman.2018.05.016 4. Celso BG, Meenrajan S. The triad that matters: Palliative medicine, code status, and health care costs. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2010;27(6):398–401. 5. Khandelwal N, Kross EK, Engelberg RA, Coe NB, Long AC, Curtis JR. Estimating the effect of palliative care interventions and advance care planning on ICU utilization: A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(5):1102–11. 6. Anderson WG, Chase R, Pantilat SZ, Tulsky JA, Auerbach AD. Code status discussions between attending hospitalist physicians and medical patients at hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):359–66. 7. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Mj B, Cl B, Kb E, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions ( Review ) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;(4):1–242. 8. Walczak A, Henselmans I, Tattersall MHN, Clayton JM, Davidson PM, Young J, et al. A qualitative analysis of responses to a question prompt list and prognosis and end-of-life care discussion prompts delivered in a communication support program. Psychooncology. 2015 Mar 1;24(3):287–93. 9. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. advances in consumer research. 1984;11:673–5. 10. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1986;19(C):123–205. 11. Fazio RH, Olson MA. The MODE model: Attitude-Behavior Processes as a Function of Motivation and Opportunity. Dual Process Theories of the Social MindFazio, R H, & Olson, M A (2014) The MODE model: Attitude-Behavior Processes as a Function of Motivation and Opportunity Dual Process Theories of the Social Mind, 1–34 Retrieved from http://www. unc.edu/~dcamer [Internet]. 2014;1–34. Available from: http://www.unc.edu/~dcameron/ dualprocess.pdf 12. Fishbein M, Hall-Jamieson K, Zimmer E, Von Haeften I, Nabi R. Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2). 13. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Strategies of Change: Active Participation. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1975. 14. Hullett CR. Using Functional Theory to Promote Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Testing. Communic Res. 2004;31(4). 15. Dillard JP, Shen L. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr. 2005;72(2).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw