Geert Kleinnibbelink

Acute Cardiac Responses vs. Cardiac Remodelling 3 87 at the lowest two-thirds of increments of EDA in the working range of the heart, and Uncoupling LD was calculated as the sum of the differences at the highest one-third of increments of EDA in the working range of the heart. Supplemental 2. Table 1 - Associations between acute functional responses to exercise and chronic RV adaption Delta RVFAC (%) Delta TAPSE (mm) Delta RV s’ (cm/s) Delta RVFWS (%) Delta RV basal diameter (mm) Pearson Correlation -0.66 -0.36 -0.27 -0.38 Sig. (2-tailed) 0.01 0.18 0.32 0.18 Delta RV mid-cavity diameter (mm) Pearson Correlation -0.12 -0.24 -0.30 -0.28 Sig. (2-tailed) 0.70 0.40 0.28 0.33 Delta RV end-diastolic area (mm) Pearson Correlation -0.09 -0.47 -0.45 -0.19 Sig. (2-tailed) 0.77 0.09 0.11 0.52 RV, Right ventricle. RVFAC, RV fractional area change. TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. TDI, tissue doppler imaging. RVFWS, RV free wall strain.