Lorynn Teela

173 Assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation 18. Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health, 38(2), 65-76, doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. 19. Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health, 36(1), 24-34, doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4. 20. Rothwell, P. M. (2005). External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet, 365(9453), 82-93, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17670-8. 21. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-18-007.html (2019). 22. Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 4, 50, doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. 23. Fleuren, M., Wiefferink, K., & Paulussen, T. (2004). Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. Int.J.Qual.Health Care, 16(2), 107-123, doi:10.1093/ intqhc/mzh030 [doi];16/2/107 [pii]. 24. Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci, 10, 53, doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. 25. Engelen, V., Haverman, L., Koopman, H., Schouten - van Meeteren, N., Meijer-van den Bergh, E., VrijmoetWiersma, J., et al. (2010). Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 81(2), 235244, doi:doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.003. 26. Fekkes, M., Theunissen, N. C., Brugman, E., Veen, S., Verrips, E. G., Koopman, H. M., et al. (2000). Development and psychometric evaluation of the TAPQOL: a health-related quality of life instrument for 1-5-year-old children. Quality of Life Research, 9(8), 961-972. 27. Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., Seid, M., & Skarr, D. (2003). The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 3(6), 329-341. 28. Haverman, L., Engelen, V., Van Rossum, M. A., Heymans, H. S., & Grootenhuis, M. A. (2011). Monitoring health-related quality of life in paediatric practice: development of an innovative web-based application. BMC Pediatrics, 11, 3-10, doi:doi:10.1186/1471-2431-11-3. 29. Schepers, S. A., Sint Nicolaas, S. M., Haverman, L., Wensing, M., Schouten van Meeteren, A. Y., Veening, M. A., et al. (2017). Real-world implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes in outpatient pediatric cancer care. Psycho-oncology, 26(7), 951-959. 30. Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Fernández, M. E., Abadie, B., & Damschroder, L. J. (2019). Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implementation Science, 14(1), 42, doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4. 31. CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool v1.0 (2019). https://cfirguide.org/choosing-strategies/. 32. Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., et al. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10(1), 21, doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1. 33. de Vet, H. C. W., Dikmans, R. E., & Eekhout, I. (2017). Specific agreement on dichotomous outcomes can be calculated for more than two raters. J Clin Epidemiol, 83, 85-89, doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.007. 34. Santana, M. J., Haverman, L., Absolom, K., Takeuchi, E., Feeny, D., Grootenhuis, M., et al. (2015). Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 24(7), 1707-1718. 35. Teela, L., Van Muilekom, M. M., Kooij, L. H., Gathier, A. W., Van Goudoever, J. B., Grootenhuis, M. A., et al. Clinicians’ perspective on the implemented KLIK PROM portal in clinical practice. Submitted. 36. Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., van Muilekom, M. M., & Grootenhuis, M. A. (2019). Options for the interpretation of and recommendations for acting on different PROMs in daily clinical practice using KLIK. . Medical Care. 37. Snyder, C. F., Smith, K. C., Bantug, E. T., Tolbert, E. E., Blackford, A. L., & Brundage, M. D. (2017). What do these scores mean? Presenting patient-reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretability. Cancer, 123(10), 1848-1859, doi:10.1002/cncr.30530. 6

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw