228 Supplement 1 - (continued) No. Author(s), year, country of study Study objective Study design Study duration Disease group Study setting Patients’ age group (yrs) Number of participants completing PREMs PREM used in the study Person completing the survey Administration method Quality score 20 Wells, R D; Dahl, B; Wilson, S D, 2001, USA20 To assess differences in care satisfaction between patients and their primary care provider. Prospective cohort 9 months Asthma, bronchitis, gastroenteritis, pneumonia Inpatient care unit 1month -18 181 Press-Ganey Physician Satisfaction Scale Proxy Paper and telephone Good 21 Toomey, Sara L; Elliott, Marc N; Zaslavsky, Alan M; Klein, David J; Ndon, Sifon; Hardy, Shannon; Wu, Melody; Schuster, Mark A, 2017, USA21 To measure the performance of different hospitals in a national field test. Observational study 15 months General Inpatient care units 0-17 17727 Child HCAHPS Proxy Paper and telephone Fair 22 Terwiel, M; Alsem, M W; Siebes, R C; Bieleman, K; Verhoef, M; Ketelaar, M, 2017, Netherlands 22 To assess the importance of each PREM item related to FCS. Observational study NR Cerebral palsy Rehabilitation centers (outpatient care) 3-9 175 MPOC-56 Proxy NR Fair 23 Williams, Geraint; Pattison, Giles; Mariathas, Chrishan; Lazar, Joanna; Rashied, Muhammad, 2011, UK23 To pinpoint aspects of patient care that could be improved to increase patient satisfaction. Prospective observational 10 months Orthopedic diseases Inpatient care units 2-6 104 Swedish parent satisfaction questionnaire Proxy NR Good
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw