242 Supplement 1 - (continued) No. Author(s), year, country of study Study objective Study design Study duration Disease group Study setting Patients’ age group (yrs) Number of participants completing PREMs PREM used in the study Person completing the survey Administration method Quality score 71 Viner RM, 2007, UK71 To evaluate the effects of creating an adolescentspecific ward on perceived care quality, relative to treating these patients in child or adult settings. Secondary data analysis NR General Varied <17 59815 National English Young Patient Survey 2004 (YPS) Both the patient and proxy Paper Good 72 Christensen, Anna L; Brown, Jonathan D; Wissow, Lawrence S; Cook, Benjamin, 2016, USA72 To assess parental satisfaction with the PCC and FCC demonstrated by medical assistants, and to compare these survey results with other elements of their care. Secondary data analysis NR General Primary clinical care 18months -16 360 Consultation and Relational Empathy measure (CARE) Proxy NR Good 73 Barsoom R.R.; Maugans T.A.; Burrows J.F.; Rosen P., 2017, USA73 To perform clinical quality improvements through the dissemination of PREMs after medical visits. Cross- sectional 3 years Neurologic diseases Outpatient care NR 458 Press Ganey Satisfaction Survey Proxy NR Good 74 Barber AJ; Tischler VA; Healy E, 2006, USA74 To evaluate the likeness of CAMHS PREMs that were completed by either themselves or their carer. Cross- sectional NR Mental health Outpatient care ≥4 118 Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ) Both the patient and the proxy Paper Good
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw