280 Chapter 9 59. Pratte M-M, Audette-Chapdelaine S, Auger A-M, Wilhelmy C, Brodeur M. Researchers’ experiences with patient engagement in health research: a scoping review and thematic synthesis. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2023;9(1):1-23. 60. Oravec N, Monnin C, Gregora A, Bjorklund B, Dave MG, Schultz AS, et al. Protocol for a scoping review to map patient engagement in scoping reviews. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2022;8(1):1-8. 61. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32. 62. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation science. 2010;5:1-9. 63. Tates K, Zwaanswijk M, Otten R, Van Dulmen S, Hoogerbrugge PM, Kamps WA, et al. Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2009;9(1):1-8. 64. Reisner SL, Randazzo RK, White Hughto JM, Peitzmeier S, DuBois LZ, Pardee DJ, et al. Sensitive health topics with underserved patient populations: Methodological considerations for online focus group discussions. Qualitative health research. 2018;28(10):1658-73. 65. Vat LE, Finlay T, Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar T, Fahy N, Robinson P, Boudes M, et al. Evaluating the “return on patient engagement initiatives” in medicines research and development: a literature review. Health Expectations. 2020;23(1):5-18. 66. van Woerden CS, Vroman H, Brand PL. Child participation in triadic medical consultations: A scoping review and summary of promotive interventions. Patient Education and Counseling. 2023:107749. 67. Catalyst N. What is patient-centered care? NEJM Catalyst. 2017;3(1). 68. Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient education and counseling. 2015;98(10):1172-9. 69. Damman OC, Jani A, de Jong BA, Becker A, Metz MJ, de Bruijne MC, et al. The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: an opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2020;26(2):524-40. 70. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. Bmj. 2010;341. 71. Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient related outcome measures. 2019:233-41. 72. Santana M-J, Feeny D. Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality of Life Research. 2014;23:1505-13. 73. van Oers HA. Optimalisatie gebruik generieke PROMs als basis voor Samen Beslissen Available online: https://projecten.zonmw.nl/nl/project/optimalisatie-gebruik-generieke-proms-als-basis-voor-samenbeslissen2022 [ 74. Cella D, Gershon R, Lai J-S, Choi S. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored shortforms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16:133-41. 75. Schalet BD, Cook KF, Choi SW, Cella D. Establishing a common metric for self-reported anxiety: linking the MASQ, PANAS, and GAD-7 to PROMIS Anxiety. Journal of anxiety disorders. 2014;28(1):88-96. 76. Choi SW, Schalet B, Cook KF, Cella D. Establishing a common metric for depressive symptoms: linking the BDI-II, CES-D, and PHQ-9 to PROMIS depression. Psychological assessment. 2014;26(2):513. 77. Wilkinson J, Powell A, Davies H. Evidence: Are clinicians engaged in quality improvement? A review of the literature on healthcare professionals’ views on quality improvement initiatives. Health Foundation. 2011. 78. Linnean. PREM zakboekje: De meest relevante basiskennis op zak. 2021.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw