Marga Hoogendoorn

32 Table 2. Continued Scoring system Nr. of articles Content Validity Reliability Validity Score Explanation Score Results Score Compared with: Results NCR-11 2 + Selection interventions with nurses 23 + Coefficient of variation 5.9-10.4% 53 +/- TISS 23 NEMS 53 r = 0.60 r not stated WICSS 1 + Selection interventions with nurses 24 NS - NS - - Acuity tool 1 +/- Selection interventions with nurses, Content Validity Index 0.85 25 + Pearson’s r 2 = 0.84 25 NS - - CCPD 1 NS - + Interrater reliability 74% Test-retest reliability 85% 26 +/- Comparing old and new system 26 NS TISS-28 9 + Selection interventions with nurse 27, 54 + ICC: 0.93 – 1.00 54, 55 +/- Time observations 56 TISS-76 27, 54, 55 NEMS 48, 57, 58 SGI-Grading System 48 NDS 19 NAS 57 SAPS 54 Between ICUs and shifts 59 Significant difference r=0.78-0.96 r=0.78 Good agreement r=0.33 NAS>TISS, p=0.001 R=0.68 Kruskal Willis: H=133.57 CritScore 1 + Selection interventions with nurses 28 NS - NS - -