Addi van Bergen

Cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the SEI-HS 105 5 Table 4. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the SEI-HS in adults of Surinamese, Moroccan and Turkish origin compared with prior validation results in the Dutch adult population [24] RMSEA (< 0.050) HI90 (< 0.060) TLI (> 0.950) CFI (> 0.900) Hoelter’s .05 Index (> 200) Factor loadings significant (p<0.001) Surinamese 0.056 0.060 0.846 0.887 334 All items Moroccan 0.063 0.069 0.781 0.838 246 All but Item#17 (p=0.052) a Turkish 0.058 0.062 0.839 0.881 320 All but Item#17 (p=0.299) a Validation in Dutch adult population 0.057 0.058 0.827 0.872 407 All items RMSEA= root mean square error of approximation; HI90 = upper bound of 90% confidence interval; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; CFI = comparative fit index. Results in italic and bold if RMSEA< 0.05, HI90<0.06, TLI ≥ 0.95, CFI > 0.90 and Hoelter’s .05 Index≥200, indicating good model fit. a Item 17: Work is just a way of earning money. For more details see S2 Table.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODAyMDc0