Iris de Nie

147 REFERENCES A 66. Persky RW, Gruschow SM, Sinaii N, Carlson C, Ginsberg JP, Dowshen NL. Attitudes Toward Fertility Preservation Among Transgender Youth and Their Parents. J Adolesc Health 2020. 67. Lai TC, McDougall R, Feldman D, Elder CV, Pang KC. Fertility Counseling for Transgender Adolescents: A Review. J Adolesc Health 2020. 68. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address aao. Access to fertility services by transgender and nonbinary persons: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2021. 69. Lind M, Visentini M, Mantyla T, Del Missier F. Choice-Supportive Misremembering: A New Taxonomy and Review. Front Psychol 2017; 8 : 2062. 70. APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. 71. Wiepjes CM, Nota NM, de Blok CJM, et al. The Amsterdam Cohort of Gender Dysphoria Study (1972-2015): Trends in Prevalence, Treatment, and Regrets. The journal of sexual medicine 2018; 15 (4): 582-90. 72. Adeleye AJ, Reid G, Kao CN, Mok-Lin E, Smith JF. Semen Parameters Among Transgender Women With a History of Hormonal Treatment. Urology 2018. 73. Auer MK, Fuss J, Nieder TO, et al. Desire to Have Children Among Transgender People in Germany: A Cross- Sectional Multi-Center Study. The journal of sexual medicine 2018; 15 (5): 757-67. 74. CBS. Life style and (preventive) health examination; personal characteristics: Statistics Netherlands; 2018. 75. KLEM. Dutch guideline for sperm banks: Klinische Chemie en Laboratoriumgeneeskunde en de Vereniging van Klinisch Embryologen; 2010. 76. van Weert JM, Repping S, Van Voorhis BJ, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW. Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2004; 82 (3): 612-20. 77. Rhemrev JP, Lens JW, McDonnell J, Schoemaker J, Vermeiden JP. The postwash total progressively motile sperm cell count is a reliable predictor of total fertilization failure during in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 2001; 76 (5): 884-91. 78. Stokes-Riner A, Thurston SW, Brazil C, et al. One semen sample or 2? Insights from a study of fertile men. J Androl 2007; 28 (5): 638-43. 79. Keel BA. Within- and between-subject variation in semen parameters in infertile men and normal semen donors. Fertil Steril 2006; 85 (1): 128-34. 80. Hart RJ, Doherty DA, McLachlan RI, et al. Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men. Hum Reprod 2015; 30 (12): 2713-24. 81. Pennings G, Ombelet W. Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly ART. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (8): 2075-9. 82. MacKenna A, Crosby J, Huidobro C, Correa E, Duque G. Semen quality before cryopreservation and after thawing in 543 patients with testicular cancer. JBRA Assist Reprod 2017; 21 (1): 31-4. 83. Keel BA, Karow AM, Jr. Motility characteristics of human sperm, nonfrozen and cryopreserved. Arch Androl 1980; 4 (3): 205-12. 84. Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Said TM, Agarwal A. Inter-sample variability in post-thaw human spermatozoa. Cryobiology 2004; 49 (2): 195-9. 85. Ricci E, Al Beitawi S, Cipriani S, et al. Semen quality and alcohol intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 34 (1): 38-47. 86. Li Y, Lin H, Li Y, Cao J. Association between socio-psycho-behavioral factors and male semen quality: systematic review and meta-analyses. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (1): 116-23. 87. Nordkap L, Jensen TK, Hansen AM, et al. Psychological stress and testicular function: a cross-sectional study of 1,215 Danish men. Fertil Steril 2016; 105 (1): 174-87 e1-2. 88. Mieusset R, Bujan L, Mansat A, Pontonnier F, Grandjean H. Effects of artificial cryptorchidism on sperm morphology. Fertil Steril 1987; 47 (1): 150-5.