119 Safety of HSG with oil-based contrast medium 5 Supplementary Table 5. (Continued) Intervention Reference Country Study design Purpose No. Population Mean age at HSG (y) (SD or IQR) Median (range) Contrast Volume OSCM (mL) Median (range) Fluoroscopy HSG results (Nunley et al., 1987) USA Cohort not spec Evaluate intravasation OSCM = 593 Subfertility (not spec) Complications: 11 preoperative before tubal reconstruction - Ethiodol 2.0-10 Yes Both tubes patent 41% Unilateral tubal occlusion 9.8% Bilateral tubal occlusion 44% (Barqawi et al., 2007) Jordan Retrospective cohort study Compare pregnancy between OSCM and WSCM OSCM = 35 WSCM = 40 Subfertility (not spec) OSCM 28 (3) OSCM 10-20 Yes None bilateral tubal occlusion (Mekaru et al., 2008) Japan Cohort not spec Evaluate thyroid function after HSG OSCM = 220 Subfertility (not spec) 35 (4.6) Lipiodol (not spec) Average 5-10 Yes - (Liu et al., 2010) China Retrospective cohort Compare complications after HSG OSCM = 100 WSCM = 300 - Mean 31 (2537) Ioidized oil (not spec). 5-10 Yes OSCM: Bilateral tubal occlusion 12% Unilateral tubal occlusion 15%
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw