122 Chapter 5 Supplementary Table 5. (Continued) Intervention Reference Country Study design Purpose No. Population Mean age at HSG (y) (SD or IQR) Median (range) Contrast Volume OSCM (mL) Median (range) Fluoroscopy HSG results (Steiner et al., 2003) USA RCT Evaluate pregnancy rates after HSG OSCM = 30 All subfertility Prim subfertility 47% 33 (3.6) Ethiodol 5-10 Yes All patent (Johnson et al., 2004) Australia RCT Evaluate pregnancy rates after OSCM = 73 All subfertility Prim subfertility 55% 33.9 (2.9) LipiodolÒ Ultra Fluid 10 Yes Bilateral tubal occlusion 8.3% (Dreyer et al., 2017) Netherlands RCT Compare pregnancy rates after HSG OSCM = 550 WSCM = 556 All subfertility Prim subfertility OSCM 67.3% OSCM 32.8 (30.1-35.7) LipiodolÒ Ultra Fluid. 9.0 (5.7-15.0) Yes OSCM: Bilateral tubal patency 86% Bilateral tubal occlusion 1.6% Not spec = not specified. OSCM = oil-soluble contrast media. WSCM = water-soluble contrast media.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw