148 Chapter 6 REFERENCES 1. Aarts JW, van Empel IW, Boivin J, Nelen WL, Kremer JA, Verhaak CM. Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: a validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(5):1112-8. 2. van der Linden MW, Westert GP, de Bakker DH, Schellevis FG. Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartsenpraktijk. Klachten en aandoeningen in de bevolking en in de huisartsenpraktijk. Utrecht/Bilthoven: NIVEL/RIVM; 2004. 3. Fertility problems: assessment and treatment [Internet]. 2013 [cited 17-02-2022]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156. 4. Bhattacharya S, Porter M, Amalraj E, Templeton A, Hamilton M, Lee AJ, et al. The epidemiology of infertility in the North East of Scotland. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12):3096-107. 5. Dreyer K, van Rijswijk J, Mijatovic V, Goddijn M, Verhoeve HR, van Rooij IAJ, et al. Oil-Based or Water-Based Contrast for Hysterosalpingography in Infertile Women. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(21):2043-52. 6. Wang YL, Gao HX, Wang JS, Wang JH, Bo L, Zhang TT, et al. Immersive virtual reality as analgesia for women during hysterosalpingography: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):102. 7. van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, Pham CT, Verhoeve HR, Hoek A, et al. Tubal flushing with oil-based or water-based contrast at hysterosalpingography for infertility: long-term reproductive outcomes of a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(1):155-62. 8. Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):821-5. 9. van Welie N, Dreyer K, van Rijswijk J, Verhoeve HR, Goddijn M, Nap AW, et al. Treatment effect of oil-based contrast is related to experienced pain at HSG: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised H2Oil study. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(12):2391-8. 10. Serrano González L, Pérez-Medina T, Bueno Olalla B, Royuela A, de Los Reyes De La Cuesta M, Saéz de la Mata D, et al. Is hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) more tolerable in terms of pain and axiety than hysterosalpingography (HSG)? A prospective real-world setting multicentre study. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(41). 11. Hindocha A, Beere L, O’Flynn H, Watson A, Ahmad G. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(9):CD006106. 12. Moore DE. Pain associated with hysterosalpingography: Ethiodol versus Salpix media. Fertil Steril. 1982;38:629-31. 13. Hoffman HG, Chambers GT, Meyer WJ, 3rd, Arceneaux LL, Russell WJ, Seibel EJ, et al. Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(2):183-91. 14. Mallari B, Spaeth EK, Goh H, Boyd BS. <p>Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis</p>. Journal of Pain Research. 2019;Volume 12:2053-85. 15. Deo N, Khan KS, Mak J, Allotey J, Gonzalez Carreras FJ, Fusari G, et al. Virtual reality for acute pain in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2021;128(1):87-95. 16. JahaniShoorab N, Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Nahvi A, Mazluom SR, Golmakani N, Talebi M, et al. The effect of virtual reality on pain in primiparity women during episiotomy repair: a randomize clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;40:219-24. 17. Mosso Vázquez JL, Wiederhold BK, Miller I, Wiederhold MD. Virtual Reality assisted anesthesia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: report of 115 cases. EMJ Innov. 2017;1(1):7582.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw