168 Chapter 7 16. Parry JP, Isaacson KB. Hysteroscopy and why macroscopic uterine factors matter for fertility. Fertility and Sterility 2019;112(2):203-211. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.031] 17. Dreyer K,Out R, Hompes PGA, Mijatovic V. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography,a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2014;102(3):821-825. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.042] 18. Tros R, van Kessel MA, van Kuijk SMJ, Oosterhuis GJE, Kuchenbecker WKH, Kwee J, et al. The capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography to diagnose tubal pathology in the work-up of subfertile women, a randomised clinical trial. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2019;236:127-132. [DOI: doi. org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.035] 19. Wang R, Watson A, Johnson N, Cheung K, Fitzgerald C, Mol BWJ, et al. Tubal flushing for subfertility (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD003718. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.pub5. 20. Mol BW, Swart P, Bossuyt PM, van Beurden M, van der Veen F. Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology. Hum Reprod. 1996 Jun;11(6):1204-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019356. PMID: 8671424. 21. Maheux-Lacroix S, Boutin A, Moore L, Bergeron M-E, Bujold E, Laberge P, et al. Hysterosalpingosonography for diagnosing tubal occlusion in subfertile women: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Human Reproduction 2014;29(5):953-963. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu024] 22. Ludwin A, Ludwin J, Szczeklik W, Martins WP. Cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis following hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy). Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology December 2019;54(6):831-834. [DOI: 10.1002/uog.20372] 23. Saunders RD, Shwayder JM and Nakajima ST. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertility and Sterility 2011;95(7):2171-2179. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.054] 24. Li Y, Qiu J, Ma B, Li T-G, Yi B, Hu H-G, et al. The role of diagnostic magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: A meta-analysis. Clinical imaging April 2021;72:11-18. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.001] 25. Unterweger M, De Geyter C, Fröhlich JM, Bongartz G, Wiesner W. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility. Human Reproduction 01 December 2002;17(12):3138-3141. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3138] 26. Volondat M, Fontas E, Delotte J, Fatfouta I, Chevallier P, Chassang M. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility – comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study. European radiology February 2019;29:501-508. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5572-2] 27. Gordts S, Campo R, Rombauts L, Brosens I. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy as an outpatient procedure for infertility investigation. Human Reproduction 1998;13(1):99-103. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.1.99] 28. Coenders-Tros R, van Kessel MA, Vernooij MMA, Oosterhuis GJE, Kuchenbecker WKH, Mol BWJ, et al. Performance of outpatient transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. Human Reproduction 2016;31(10):2285-2291. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew161] 29. Shibahara H, Shimada K, Kikuchi K, Hirano Y, Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, et al. Major complications and outcome of diagnostic and operative transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007;33(5):705-709. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00636.x] 30. Federation Medical Specialists. Exploratory Fertility Workup [Oriënterend Fertiliteits Onderzoek]. Richtlijnendatabase. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/orienterend_fertiliteitsonderzoek_ofo/startpagina_orienterend_fertilitietsonderzoek.html 2015;Last access February 7th, 2021.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw