212 Chapter 8 Table 1. Respondent characteristics Question n (%) Total respondents (%/invitees) 30 (32) Occupation* Fellow 1 (3.3) Urologist 29 (97) Professor 12 (40) Chief 9 (30) Trainer 9 (30) Years of experience 0 to 5 6 (20) 6 to 10 4 (13) 11 to 15 10 (33) 16 to 20 8 (27) More than 20 2 (6.7) RARPs performed personally <500 8 (27) 501 to 1000 4 (13) 1001 to 1500 3 (10) 1501 to 2000 5 (17) 2001 to 2500 5 (17) 2501 to 3000 3 (10) >3500 2 (6.7) RARPs performed in centre/network yearly <500 20 (67) 501 to 1000 5 (17) 1001 to 1500 1 (3.3) 1501 to 2000 2 (6.7) 2501 to 3000 1 (3.3) >3500 1 (3.3) Urologists performing RARP in your centre/network 1 to 3 9 (30) 4 to 6 17 (57) 7 to 9 3 (10) 10 to 12 1 (3.3) (56%) included surgical video review (Table 2). One respondent was in the process of including surgical video review in their clinic. The postoperative results analyses were held at various intervals. Two respondents analysed and reviewed the data alone. Twenty-five (83%) respondents held the meetings in a team, of which eight only with urology staff, 13 with urology staff and residents, and four held one-on-one meetings. None invited nurses or operating room staff to the review meeting.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw