248 Chapter 9 1. Varban OA, Niemann A, Stricklen A, Ross R, Ghaferi AA, Finks JF, Dimick JB. Far from Standardized: Using Surgical Videos to Identify Variation in Technique for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech [Internet]. 2017 Aug 1 [cited 2017 Aug 18];27(8):761–7. 2. Oussi N, Loukas C, Kjellin A, Lahanas V, Georgiou K, Henningsohn L, Felländer-Tsai L, Georgiou E, Enochsson L. Video analysis in basic skills training: a way to expand the value and use of BlackBox training? Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2017 Jun 29 [cited 2017 Aug 18];1–9. 3. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O ’reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJO. Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric Surgery for the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 17];369:1434–42. 4. Goldenberg MG, Lee JY, Kwong JCC, Grantcharov TP, Costello A. Implementing assessments of robot-assisted technical skill in urological education: a systematic review and synthesis of the validity evidence. Vol. 122, BJU International. 2018. 5. Brinkman W, de Angst I, Schreuder H, Schout B, Draaisma W, Verweij L, Hendrikx A, van der Poel H. Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2017;31(1):281–7. 6. Hussein AA, Ghani KR, Peabody J, Sarle R, Abaza R, Eun D, Hu J, Fumo M, Lane B, Montgomery JS, Hinata N, Rooney D, Comstock B, Chan HK, Mane SS, Mohler JL, Wilding G, Miller D, Guru KA. Development and Validation of an Objective Scoring Tool for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation. J Urol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 12];197(5):1237– 44. 7. Mayr R, Fritsche H-M, Pycha AA, Pycha AA. Radical cystectomy and the implications of comorbidity. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther [Internet]. 2014 Mar 8 [cited 2017 Jan 24];14(3):289–95. 8. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: Validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2017 Aug 29];187(1):247–52. 9. Goldenberg MG, Goldenberg L, Grantcharov TP. Surgeon Performance Predicts Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol [Internet]. 2017 Jun 26 [cited 2018 Jun 18];31(9):end.2017.0284. 10. Hung AJ, Chen J, Che Z, Nilanon T, Jarc A, Titus M, Oh PJ, Gill IS, Liu Y. Utilizing Machine Learning and Automated Performance Metrics to Evaluate Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performance and Predict Outcomes. J Endourol [Internet]. 2018 May [cited 2019 Jul 25];32(5):438–44. 11. van Basten JPA, Somford RM, de Baaij J, Sedelaar M, Vrijhof E. Initiatief Comprehensive Prostate Cancer Network (CPCN) in Zuidoost Nederland. Tijdschr voor Urol. 2017;7(6–7):134–44. 12. Sotelo RJRJ, Haese A, Machuca V, Medina L, Nuñez L, Santinelli F, Hernandez AA, Kural AR, Mottrie A, Giedelman C, Mirandolino M, Palmer K, Abaza R, Ghavamian R, Shalhav A, Moinzadeh A, Patel V, Stifelman M, Tuerk I, et al. Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2016 Feb 1 [cited 2017 Jun 11];69(2):334–44. 13. Chen J, Cheng N, Cacciamani G, Oh P, Lin-Brande M, Remulla D, Gill IS, Hung AJ. Objective Assessment of Robotic Surgical Technical Skill: A Systematic Review. J Urol. 2019;201(3):461–9. 14. Husslein H, Shirreff L, Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Grantcharov TP. The Generic Error Rating Tool: A Novel Approach to Assessment of Performance and Surgical Education in Gynecologic Laparoscopy. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2015 Nov [cited 2018 Jun 22];72(6):1259–65. 15. Hung AJ, Oh PJ, Chen J, Ghodoussipour S, Lane C, Jarc A, Gill IS. Experts vs.. super-experts: differences in automated performance metrics and clinical outcomes for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int [Internet]. 2019 May;123(5):861–8. 16. Hung AJ, Chen J, Jarc A, Hatcher D, Djaladat H, Gill IS. Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy – A Pilot Study. J Urol [Internet]. 2017 Jul 29 [cited 2017 Aug 9];199(1):296–304. 17. Beulens AJW, Brinkman WM, Van der Poel HG, Vis AN, van Basten JP, Meijer RP, Wijburg CJ, Hendrikx AJM, van Merriënboer JJG, Wagner C. Linking surgical skills to postoperative outcomes: a Delphi study on the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg [Internet]. 2019; 18. Volpe A, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P, Ficarra V, Novara G, Van Der Poel H, Mottrie A. Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Jun 12];68(2):9–2. 19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159. 20. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall; 1991. 611 p. 21. Kohjimoto Y, Yamashita S, Kikkawa K, Iba A, Matsumura N, Hara I. The association of length of the resected membranous urethra with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urol J. 2019;epub(c):2–6. 22. Haga N, Ogawa S, Yabe M, Akaihata H, Hata J, Sato Y, Ishibashi K, Hasegawa O, Kikuchi K, Shishido F, Kojima Y. Factors Contributing to Early Recovery of Urinary Continence Analysed by Pre- and Postoperative Pelvic Anatomical Features at Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;29(6):683–90. 23. Grivas N, van der Roest R, Tillier C, Schouten D, van Muilekom E, Schoots I, van der Poel H, Heijmink S. Patterns of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Are References
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw