Alexander Beulens

322 Chapter 12 1. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg [Internet]. 1997 Feb [cited 2017 Dec 28];84(2):273–8. 2. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O ’reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJO. Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric Surgery for the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 17];369:1434–42. 3. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: Validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2017 Aug 29];187(1):247–52. 4. Hussein AA, Ghani KR, Peabody J, Sarle R, Abaza R, Eun D, Hu J, Fumo M, Lane B, Montgomery JS, Hinata N, Rooney D, Comstock B, Chan HK, Mane SS, Mohler JL, Wilding G, Miller D, Guru KA. Development and Validation of an Objective Scoring Tool for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation. J Urol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 12];197(5):1237– 44. 5. Husslein H, Shirreff L, Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Grantcharov TP. The Generic Error Rating Tool: A Novel Approach to Assessment of Performance and Surgical Education in Gynecologic Laparoscopy. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2015 Nov [cited 2018 Jun 22];72(6):1259–65. 6. Beulens AJW, Brinkman WM, Van der Poel HG, Vis AN, van Basten JP, Meijer RP, Wijburg CJ, Hendrikx AJM, van Merriënboer JJG, Wagner C. Linking surgical skills to postoperative outcomes: a Delphi study on the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg [Internet]. 2019; 7. Goldenberg MG, Goldenberg L, Grantcharov TP. Surgeon Performance Predicts Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol [Internet]. 2017 Jun 26 [cited 2018 Jun 18];31(9):end.2017.0284. 8. Hung AJ, Chen J, Jarc A, Hatcher D, Djaladat H, Gill IS. Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy – A Pilot Study. J Urol [Internet]. 2017 Jul 29 [cited 2017 Aug 9];199(1):296–304. 9. Ganni S, Botden SMBI, Chmarra M, Goossens RHM, Jakimowicz JJ. A software-based tool for video motion tracking in the surgical skills assessment landscape. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2018 Jun 16 [cited 2018 Jun 21];32(6):2994–9. 10. Hung AJ, Chen J, Che Z, Nilanon T, Jarc A, Titus M, Oh PJ, Gill IS, Liu Y. Utilizing Machine Learning and Automated Performance Metrics to Evaluate Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performance and Predict Outcomes. J Endourol [Internet]. 2018 May [cited 2019 Jul 25];32(5):438–44. 11. Rfd WUN, Hohú DX. International Prostate Symptom Score. 2011;8(3):227–30. 12. Description O. International Prostate Symptom Score ( IPSS ). 2014;35(January 2009):4–5. 13. van Andel G, Bottomley A, Fosså SD, Efficace F, Coens C, Guerif S, Kynaston H, Gontero P, Thalmann G, Akdas A, D’Haese S, Aaronson NK. An international field study of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: A questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(16):2418–24. 14. Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Curran D, Groenvold M, EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual The EORTC QLQ-C30 Introduction. 2001;30:78. 15. Chang YJ, Chang CH, Peng CL, Wu HC, Lin HC, Wang JY, Li TC, Yeh YC, Liang WM. Measurement equivalence and feasibility of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: Paper-and-pencil versus touch-screen administration. Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2014;12(1):1–10. 16. Hung AJ, Oh PJ, Chen J, Ghodoussipour S, Lane C, Jarc A, Gill IS. Experts vs.. super-experts: differences in automated performance metrics and clinical outcomes for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int [Internet]. 2019 May;123(5):861–8. References

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw