343 General discussion, conclusions, and future perspectives Continence in Men Undergoing a Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Urology [Internet]. 2017;107:196–201. 24. Song W, Kim CK, Park BK, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo S Il, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM. Impact of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length measured by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(3–4):E93–9. 25. Kohjimoto Y, Yamashita S, Kikkawa K, Iba A, Matsumura N, Hara I. The association of length of the resected membranous urethra with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urol J. 2019;epub(c):2–6. 26. Ganni S, Botden SMBI, Chmarra M, Goossens RHM, Jakimowicz JJ. A software-based tool for video motion tracking in the surgical skills assessment landscape. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2018 Jun 16 [cited 2018 Jun 21];32(6):2994–9. 27. Schreuder HWRR, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RHMM. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: A systematic review. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2012 Jan [cited 2017 Dec 5];119(2):137–49. 28. Nifong LW, Chitwood WR. Building a surgical robotics program. Am J Surg [Internet]. 2004 Oct 1 [cited 2020 May 29];188(4):16–8. 29. Chitwood WR, Nifong LW, Chapman WHH, Felger JE, Bailey BM, Ballint T, Mendleson KG, Kim VB, Young JA, Albrecht RA. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. In: Annals of Surgery [Internet]. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2001 [cited 2020 May 29]. p. 475–86. 30. Guzzo TJ, Gonzalgo ML. Robotic surgical training of the urologic oncologist. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig [Internet]. 2009;27(2):214–7. 31. Mottrie A, Novara G, van der Poel H, Dasgupta P, Montorsi F, Gandaglia G. The European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum: An Update. Eur Urol Focus [Internet]. 2016;2(1):105–8. 32. Samadi D, Levinson A, Hakimi A, Shabsigh R, Benson MC. From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic-assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience. World J Urol [Internet]. 2007 Mar [cited 2020 May 30];25(1):105–10. 33. Rashid HH, Leung YYM, Rashid MJ, Oleyourryk G, Valvo JR, Eichel L. Robotic surgical education: A systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology [Internet]. 2006 Jul [cited 2020 May 30];68(1):75–9. 34. Collins JW, Levy J, Stefanidis D, Gallagher A, Coleman M, Cecil T, Ericsson A, Mottrie A, Wiklund P, Ahmed K, Pratschke J, Casali G, Ghazi A, Gomez M, Hung A, Arnold A, Dunning J, Martino M, Vaz C, et al. Utilising the Delphi Process to Develop a Proficiency-based Progression Train-the-trainer Course for Robotic Surgery Training. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2019;75(5):775–85. 35. Dulan G, Rege R V., Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KK, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ. Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology. Am J Surg [Internet]. 2012;203(4):535–9. 36. Dulan G, Rege R V., Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ. Proficiency based training for robotic surgery: Construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1516–21. 37. Moglia A, Sinceri S, Ferrari V, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Morelli L. Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study. Updates Surg [Internet]. 2018;70(3):401–5. 38. Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2004;24(3):177–81. 39. Jones DB, Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Dimick JB, Jacob BP, Schultz L, Scott DJ. SAGES University MASTERS Program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(8):3061–71. 40. Feldman LS, Pryor AD, Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ, Schultz L, Awad MM, Ritter EM. SAGES Video-Based Assessment (VBA) program: a vision for life-long learning for surgeons. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2020;34(8):3285–8. 41. Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology [Internet]. Vol. 32, Surgical Endoscopy. Surg Endosc; 2018 [cited 2020 May 30]. p. 1636–55. 42. Hung AJ, Oh PJ, Chen J, Ghodoussipour S, Lane C, Jarc A, Gill IS. Experts vs super-experts: differences in automated performance metrics and clinical outcomes for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int [Internet]. 2019 May;123(5):861–8. 43. Chen J, Cheng N, Cacciamani G, Oh P, Lin-Brande M, Remulla D, Gill IS, Hung AJ. Objective Assessment of Robotic Surgical Technical Skill: A Systematic Review. J Urol. 2019;201(3):461–9. 44. Hung AJ, Chen J, Che Z, Nilanon T, Jarc A, Titus M, Oh PJ, Gill IS, Liu Y. Utilizing Machine Learning and Automated Performance Metrics to Evaluate Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performance and Predict Outcomes. J Endourol [Internet]. 2018 May [cited 2019 Jul 25];32(5):438–44. 45. Andras I, Mazzone E, Leeuwen FWB Van, Naeyer G De, Oosterom MN Van, Beato S, Buckle T, Sullivan SO, Leeuwen PJ Van, Beulens A, Crisan N, Hondt FD, Schatteman P, Poel H Van Der, Dell P, Mottrie A. Artificial intelligence and robotics : a combination that is changing the operating room. World J Urol [Internet]. 2019;(0123456789). 46. Cates JA, Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Grantcharov TP. Development of a black-box data recording device in the operating room: a proof-ofconcept study. J Am Coll Surg [Internet]. 2013 Sep 1 [cited 2018 Jun 22];217(3):S65. 47. Van Oosterom MN, Van Der Poel HG, Navab N, Van De Velde CJH, Van Leeuwen FWB. Computer-assisted surgery: Virtual- and augmented-reality displays for navigation during urological interventions [Internet]. Vol. 28, Current Opinion in Urology. Curr Opin Urol; 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 3]. p. 205–13. 48. Chen CH, Sühn T, Illanes A, Maldonado I, Ahmad H, Wex C, Croner R, Boese A, Friebe M. Proximally placed signal acquisition sensoric for robotic tissue tool interactions. Curr Dir Biomed Eng.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw