373 Nederlandse samenvatting 25. Shim JS, Kim JY, Pyun JH, Cho S, Oh MM, Kang SH, Lee JG, Kim JJ, Cheon J, Kang SG. Comparison of effective teaching methods to achieve skill acquisition using a robotic virtual reality simulator Expert proctoring versus an educational video versus independent training. Med (United States). 2018;97(51):1–5. 26. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol [Internet]. 2011;185(4):1191– 7. 27. Wijewickrema S, Zhou Y, Bailey J, Kennedy G, O’Leary S. Provision of automated step-by-step procedural guidance in virtual reality surgery simulation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology - VRST ’16 [Internet]. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2016 [cited 2020 Apr 20]. p. 69–72. 28. Goldenberg MG, Lee JY, Kwong JCCC, Grantcharov TP, Costello A. Implementing assessments of robot-assisted technical skill in urological education: a systematic review and synthesis of the validity evidence [Internet]. BJU International Mar 31, 2018. 29. Brinkman WM, Luursema JM, Kengen B, Schout BMA, Witjes JA, Bekkers RL. Da vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills. Urology [Internet]. 2013;81(3):562–6. 30. Aghazadeh MA, Mercado MA, Pan MM, Miles BJ, Goh AC. Performance of robotic simulated skills tasks is positively associated with clinical robotic surgical performance. BJU Int [Internet]. 2016 Sep [cited 2017 Aug 9];118(3):475–81. 31. Schout BMA, Ananias HJK, Bemelmans BLH, D’Ancona FCH, Muijtjens AMM, Dolmans VEMG, Scherpbier AJJA, Hendrikx AJM. Transfer of cysto-urethroscopy skills from a virtual-reality simulator to the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int [Internet]. 2009 Nov 12 [cited 2020 Apr 22];106(2):226–31. 32. Mazzone E, Dell’oglio P, Mottrie A. Outcomes report of the first erus robotic urology curriculum-trained surgeon in turkey: The importance of structured and validated training programs for global outcomes improvement [Internet]. Vol. 45, Turkish Journal of Urology. Turkish Association of Urology; 2019 [cited 2020 May 21]. p. 189–90. 33. Bedir F, Keske M, Demirdögen SO, Kocatürk H, Koç E, Canda AE, Atmaca AF. Robotic radical prostatectomy in 93 cases: Outcomes of the first ERUS robotic urology curriculum trained surgeon in Turkey. Turkish J Urol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 21];45(3):183–8. 34. Gamboa AJR, Santos RT, Sargent ER, Louie MK, Box GN, Sohn KH, Truong H, Lin R, Khosravi A, Santos R, Ornstein DK, Ahlering TE, Tyson DR, Clayman R V., McDougall EM. Long-Term Impact of a Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Mini Fellowship Training Program on Postgraduate Urological Practice Patterns. J Urol [Internet]. 2009;181(2):778– 82. 35. McDougall EM, Corica FA, Chou DS, Abdelshehid CS, Uribe CA, Stoliar G, Sala LG, Khonsari SS, Eichel L, Boker JR, Ahlering TE, Clayman R V. Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy ‘mini-residency’ experience on postgraduate urologists’ practice patterns. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg [Internet]. 2006 Mar [cited 2020 Mar 4];2(1):70–4. 36. Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W, Seigne JD. The Cost of Learning Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72(5):1068–72. 37. Buffi N, Van Der Poel H, Guazzoni G, Mottrie A. Methods and priorities of robotic surgery training program [Internet]. Vol. 65, European Urology. Eur Urol; 2014 [cited 2020 May 21]. p. 1–2. 38. Sridhar AN, Briggs TP, Kelly JD, Nathan S. Training in Robotic Surgery—an Overview. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(8). 39. Brook NR, Dell’Oglio P, Barod R, Collins J, Mottrie A. Comprehensive training in robotic surgery [Internet]. Vol. 29, Current Opinion in Urology. Curr Opin Urol; 2019 [cited 2020 May 21]. p. 1–9. 40. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O ’reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJO. Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric Surgery for the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 17];369:1434–42. 41. Goldenberg MG, Goldenberg L, Grantcharov TP. Surgeon Performance Predicts Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol [Internet]. 2017 Jun 26 [cited 2018 Jun 18];31(9):end.2017.0284. 42. Hussein AA, Ghani KR, Peabody J, Sarle R, Abaza R, Eun D, Hu J, Fumo M, Lane B, Montgomery JS, Hinata N, Rooney D, Comstock B, Chan HK, Mane SS, Mohler JL, Wilding G, Miller D, Guru KA. Development and Validation of an Objective Scoring Tool for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation. J Urol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 12];197(5):1237– 44. 43. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: Validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2017 Aug 29];187(1):247–52. 44. Robertson ER, Hadi M, Morgan LJ, Pickering SP, Collins G, New S, Griffin D, McCulloch P, Catchpole KC. Oxford NOTECHS II: A Modified Theatre Team Non-Technical Skills Scoring System. Roma PG, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2014 Mar 4 [cited 2018 Oct 26];9(3):e90320. 45. Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P. The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care [Internet]. 2009 Apr 1 [cited 2018 Oct 26];18(2):104–8. 46. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Adams S, Pandey V, Darzi A. A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2005 Nov [cited 2018 Oct 26];242(5):631–9. 47. Flin R, Patey R. Non-technical skills for anaesthetists: developing and applying ANTS. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol [Internet]. 2011 Jun 1 [cited 2018 Oct 26];25(2):215–27. 48. Mitchell L, Flin R, Yule S, Mitchell J, Coutts K, Youngson G. Development of a behavioural marker
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw