Chapter 1 – General introduction 27 Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008;65(2):220-231. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.34 70. Benedetti F, Durando J, Vighetti S. Nocebo and placebo modulation of hypobaric hypoxia headache involves the cyclooxygenase-prostaglandins pathway. Pain. 2014;155(5):921-928. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.01.016 71. Albu S, Meagher MW. Expectation of nocebo hyperalgesia affects EEG alphaactivity. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2016;109:147-152. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.009 72. Pazzaglia C, Testani E, Giordano R, Padua L, Valeriani M. Expectation to feel more pain disrupts the habituation of laser-pain rating and laser-evoked potential amplitudes. Neuroscience. 2016;333:244-251. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.027 73. Tu Y, Park J, Ahlfors SP, et al. A neural mechanism of direct and observational conditioning for placebo and nocebo responses. NeuroImage. Published online 2019. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.020 74. Colloca L, Petrovic P, Wager TD, Ingvar M, Benedetti F. How the number of learning trials affects placebo and nocebo responses. Pain. 2010;151(2):430-439. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.007 75. Amanzio M. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Nocebo effects and psychotropic drug action Nocebo effects and psychotropic drug action. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8(2):159-161. doi:10.1586/17512433.2015.992877doi.org/10.1586/17512433.2015.992877 76. Izquierdo I, Medina JH, Bianchin M, et al. Memory processing by the limbic system: Role of specific neurotransmitter systems. Behavioural Brain Research. 1993;58(12):91-98. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(93)90093-6 77. Kornhuber HH. Neural Control of Input into Long Term Memory: Limbic System and Amnestic Syndrome in Man. In: Zippel HP, ed. Memory and Transfer of Information. Springer US; 1973:1-22. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2052-4_1 78. Berger TW, Thompson RF. Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. I. The hippocampus. Brain Research. 1978;145(2):323-346. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(78)90866-1 79. Vinogradova OS. Functional Organization of the Limbic System in the Process of Registration of Information: Facts and Hypotheses. In: Isaacson RL, Pribram KH, eds. The Hippocampus. Springer US; 1975:3-69. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2979-4_1 80. Sutherland RJ, Rudy JW. Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology. 1989;17(2):129144. doi:10.3758/BF03337828 81. Whitlock JR, Heynen AJ, Shuler MG, Bear MF. Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Science. 2006;313(5790):1093-1097. doi:10.1126/science.1128134 82. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O’Reilly RC. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review. 1995;102(3):419-457. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419 83. Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain. 1995;118(1):279-306. 84. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8(12):539-546. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003 85. Sapolsky RM. Stress and Plasticity in the Limbic System. Neuroch. Research.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw