Understanding distributed leadership practices in and around teacher teams 5 119 Appendix 5.4 Descriptives of advice-seeking The networks of Advice-seeking were moderately to highly dense (41 to 86%), see the table below. Regarding reciprocity, the teacher teams scored moderately to high (42 to 86%). Regarding network indegree centralisation, the teacher teams scored low to medium. Descriptive Network Statistics per Teacher team on Advice-seeking, ordered From High to Low Distributed Leadership Team Advice-Seeking Density Reci. Centr. L 0.857 0.810 0.122 H 0.800 0.861 0.099 N 0.833 0.800 0.200 I 0.764 0.800 0.125 K 0.857 0.762 0.122 G 0.611 0.618 0.110 B 0.718 0.589 0.166 F 0.678 0.659 0.214 D 0.636 0.659 0.207 M 0.686 0.417 0.163 J 0.551 0.593 0.265 E 0.521 0.444 0.273 C 0.464 0.588 0.273 A 0.405 0.456 0.289 Note. Reci is reciprocity, Centr. is indegree centrality. The standard deviations of density were between .2 and .4 in all teams. The scores on density, reciprocity, and indegree centrality for advice-seeking were used to determine the degree of distributed leadership of each teacher team. Teacher teams are relatively ordered, compared to each other, from higher to lower degrees of distributed leadership.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw