183 Conclusions 6 Rutting, L., Vervoort, J. M., Mees, H., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2021). Participatory scenario planning and framing of social-ecological systems: An analysis of policy formulation processes in Rwanda and Tanzania. Ecology and Society, 26(4), art20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12665-260420 Sampson, D. A., Quay, R., & White, D. D. (2016). Environmental Science & Policy Anticipatory modeling for water supply sustainability in Phoenix , Arizona. Environmental Science and Policy, 55, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.014 Sardar, Z. (1993). Colonizing the future: The ‘other’ dimension of futures studies. Futures, 25(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90163-N Sarkki, S., Ficko, A., Grunewald, K., Kyriazopoulos, A. P., & Nijnik, M. (2017). How pragmatism in environmental science and policy can undermine sustainability transformations: The case of marginalized mountain areas under climate and land-use change. Sustainability Science, 12(4), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0411-3 Selin, C. (2011). Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9315-x Sénit, C., & Biermann, F. (2021). InWhose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society. Global Policy, 1758-5899.12997. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12997 Shackley, S., &Wynne, B. (1996). Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. 21(3), 275–302. Spijkers, J., Merrie, A., Wabnitz, C. C. C., Osborne, M., Mobjörk, M., Bodin, Ö., Selig, E. R., Le Billon, P., Hendrix, C. S., Singh, G. G., Keys, P. W., & Morrison, T. H. (2021). Exploring the future of fishery conflict through narrative scenarios. One Earth, 4(3), 386–396. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.004 Stirling, A. (2008). “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 262–294. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265 Stripple, J., Nikoleris, A., & Hildingsson, R. (2021). Carbon Ruins: Engaging with Post-Fossil Transitions through Participatory World-Building. Politics and Governance, 9(2), 87–99. https:// doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3816 Taylor, P., Few, R., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2014). Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. 3062(December), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2 007.9685637 Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., & Hulme, M. (2016). What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004 Urry, J. (2016). What is the Future. Polity. Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. van der Hel, S. (2020). New Science Institutions for Global Sustainability. Utrecht University. van Notten, P. W. F., Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M. B. A., & Rothman, D. S. (2003). An updated scenario typology. Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00090-3 Verschuren, P., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Designing a Research Project (2nd ed.). Eleven International Publishing.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw