191 Appendixes A Appendix 3.1 (Continued) Statements in anticipation process reports Country What type of anticipation process was held? Who initiated and/or funded it? How did the anticipation process inform policy? Niger (see regional below) - - - Mali Cost-benefit analysis training with private sector, Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) using an interactive online tool that supports enterprises in analyzing climate change risks and developing individualized climate change adaptation strategies (Adelphi, n.d.) Facilitated by Adelphi Consultants. Funded through the GIZ project Private Sector Adaptation to Climate Change (PSACC) Local case studies highlight diverse ways of implementation of measures Participatory foresight to explore long term changes in an irrigation scheme using exploratory scenarios with different stakeholders based on interest and power: scientist, engineers, policymakers, local civil society representatives, private sector (Hertzog et al., 2017) French center for international cooperation in agricultural research for development (CIRAD) UMR, IRD, IER ESPGRN (France, Mali & Senegal). Funded by CIRAD and the French development agency (AFD) Provides policy recommendations, close collaboration with the Malian Institute of Rural Economy (IER), the Office du Niger operator and the Malian authorities, integration was abrupted by the Malian civil war Regional Population scenarios and climate scenarios to test the effect of population policies and population control on water stress under climate change horizon 2085 (Gunasekara et al., 2013) Initiated by Tohoku University, University of Bristol and University of Tokyo. Funded by Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-8) of the Ministry of Environment, Japan Provides policy recommendations, no explicit policy outcomes formulated in the document assessed
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw