25 Introduction 1 REFERENCES Adger, W. N., & Vincent, K. (2005). Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. Comptes Rendus - Geoscience, 337(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2004.11.004 Alcamo, J. (2008). Chapter Six The SAS Approach: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Environmental Scenarios. In Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 123–150). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00406-7 Anderson, B. R. O. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed). Verso. Anderson, B. R. O. (2007). Hope for nanotechnology: Anticipatory knowledge and the governance of affect. Area, 39(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00743.x Andersson, J. (2018). The Future of the World. Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.52 Appadurai, A. (2013). The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition. Verso. Atkinson, G. (2015). Cost – benefit analysis: A tool that is both useful and influential ? The Tools of Policy Formulation : Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects, 142–160. https://doi. org/10.4337/9781783477043.00018 Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C., & Guston, D. H. (2008). Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration. In E. J. Hacket, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (3rd ed., pp. 979–1000). MIT Press. Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative Case Studies: An Innovative Approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929 Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., Vaughan, N. E., & Lenton, T. M. (2012). A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.197 Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., Vaughan, N. E., & Lenton, T. M. (2013). ‘Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-Criteria Mapping of options for tackling climate change. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 926–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.011 Beunen, R., & Patterson, J. J. (2019). Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: Exploring the concept of ‘institutional work’. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1257423 Biermann, F. (2007). ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010 Biermann, F., & Möller, I. (2019). Rich man’s solution? Climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the Global South. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09431-0
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw