92 Chapter 4 REFERENCES 1. Akoglu H (2018) User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med 18:91–93. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j. tjem.2018.08.001 2. Alexeev T, Kavanagh B, Miften M, Altunbas C (2018) Two-dimensional antiscatter grid: a novel scatter rejection device for cone-beam computed tomography. Med Phys 45:529–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12724 3. Amerongen AV, Veerman EC (2002) Saliva–the defender of the oral cavity. Oral Dis 8:12–22. https ://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.1o816 .x 4. Balta JY, Twomey M, Moloney F, Duggan O, Murphy KP, O’Connor OJ, Cronin M, Cryan JF, Maher MM, O’Mahony SM (2019) A comparison of embalming fluids on the structures and properties of tissue in human cadavers. Anat Histol Embryol 48:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12412 5. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januario AL, Faber J, Bezerra AC (2009) A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol 36:564–568. https ://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1600051X.2009.01422 .x 6. Brenner E (2014) Human body preservation—old and new techniques. J Anat 224:316–344. https: //doi.org/10.1111/joa.12160 7. Budai M, Farkas LG, Tompson B, Katic M, Forrest CR (2003) Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women. J Craniofac Surg 14:154–161. https ://doi. org/10.1097/000016 65-200303000-00004 (discussion 162–153) 8. Collins LM, Dawes C (1987) The surface area of the adult humanmouth and thickness of the salivary film covering the teeth and oral mucosa. J Dent Res 66:1300–1302. https ://doi. org/10.1177/00220 34587 06600 80201 9. de Almeida NH, Michel-Crosato E, de Paiva LA, Biazevic MG (2013) Facial soft tissue thickness in the Brazilian population: new reference data and anatomical landmarks. Forensic Sci Int 231:404.e401–404.e407. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.forsc iint.2013.05.024 10. DeCarlo D, Metaxas D, Stone M (1998) An anthropometric face model using variational techniques. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 25th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques—SIGGRAPH 98:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/28081 4.28082 3 11. Ding X, Suzuki S, Shiga M, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T, Moriyama K (2018) Evaluation of tongue volume and oral cavity capacity using cone-beam computed tomography. Odontology 106:266–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1026 6-017-0335-0 12. Eisma R, Lamb C, Soames RW (2013) From formalin to Thiel embalming: what changes? One anatomy department’s experiences. Clin Anat 26:564–571. https: // doi.org/10.1002/ca.22222 13. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR (2007) Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females. Ann Plast Surg 59:692–698. https: //doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000258954. 5506 8 .b4 14. Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8:23–34
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw