4 Comparing anorectal function tests 115 References 1. Carrington EV, Heinrich H, Knowles CH, et al. The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2020. doi:10.1111/nmo.13679. 2. Lam TJ, Felt-Bersma RJF. Clinical examination remains more important than anorectal function tests to identify treatable conditions in women with constipation. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00192-0121796-x. 3. Tantiphlachiva K, Rao P, Attaluri A, Rao SSC. Digital rectal examination is a useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2010;8(11):955-960. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.06.031. 4. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Prospective assessment of the clinical value of anorectal investigations. Digestion. 2000;61(3):207-214.doi:10.1159/000007759. 5. BharuchaAE,LacyBE.Mechanisms,Evaluation,andManagementofChronicConstipation. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(5):1232-1249. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.034. 6. Koppen IJN, Kuizenga-Wessel S, Lu PL, et al. Surgical decision-making in the management of children with intractable functional constipation: What are we doing and are we doing it right? Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.023. 7. Rao SSC, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, et al. Anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009. 8. Carrington EV, Scott SM, Bharucha A, et al. Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(5):309-323. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2018.27. 9. Beatrice DO, Gaetano DV, Dario C, Girolamo G. Reliability of digital rectal examination as compared to anal manometry in chronic anal fissure. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2021;44(7):1015-1016. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.04.044. 10. Voorham-Van Der Zalm PJ, Voorham JC, Van Den Bos TWL, et al. Reliability and differentiation of pelvic floor muscle electromyography measurements in healthy volunteers using a new device: The Multiple Array Probe Leiden (MAPLe). Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2013;32(4):341-348. doi:10.1002/nau.22311. 11. Ouchi M, Kitta T, Takahashi Y, et al. Reliability of manometry for assessing pelvic floor muscle function in healthy men. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2020. doi:10.1002/ nau.24374. 12. Gosling J, Plumb A, Taylor SA, Cohen R, Emmanuel AV. High-resolution anal manometry: Repeatability, validation, and comparison with conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2019. doi:10.1111/nmo.13591. 13. Chakraborty S, Feuerhak KJ, Zinsmeister AR, Bharucha AE. Reproducibility of highdefinition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2017. doi:10.1111/ nmo.12950. 14. Coss-Adame E, Rao SSC, Valestin J, Ali-Azamar A, Remes-Troche JM. Accuracy and Reproducibility of High-definition Anorectal Manometry and Pressure Topography Analyses in Healthy Subjects. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2015;13(6):1143-1150.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.12.034.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw