Chapter 4 116 15. Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M, et al. Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2007;22(7):783-790. doi:10.1007/s00384-006-0217-3. 16. Prichard DO, Fetzer JR. Retrospective evaluation of operator bias in the performance of high-resolution anorectal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. Mar 3 2022:e14341. doi:10.1111/nmo.14341. 17. Felt-Bersma RJF, Strijers RLM, Janssen JJWM, Visser SL, Meuwissen SGM. The external anal sphincter - Relationship between anal manometry and anal electromyography and its clinical relevance. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1989;32(2):112-6. doi:10.1007/ BF02553822. 18. Mills PM, Hosker GL, Kiff ES, Smith ARB. Strength-duration testing of the external anal sphincter in females with anorectal dysfunction. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2002;45(1):83-90. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6118-z. 19. Thomas C, Lefaucheur JP, Galula G, De Parades V, Bourguignon J, Atienza P. Respective value of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and anal sphincter electromyography in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Neurophysiologie Clinique. 2002;32(1):85-90. doi:10.1016/S0987-7053(01)00287-8. 20. Liu J, Lv C, Huang Y, et al. Digital Rectal Examination Is a Valuable Bedside Tool for Detecting Dyssynergic Defecation: A Diagnostic Study and a Meta-Analysis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;2021:5685610. doi:10.1155/2021/5685610. 21. van Reijn-Baggen DA, Elzevier HW, Putter H, Pelger RCM, Han-Geurts IJM. Pelvic floor physical therapy in patients with chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol. Jul 2022;26(7):571-582. doi:10.1007/s10151-022-02618-9. 22. Felt-Bersma RJF, Vlietstra MS, Vollebregt PF, Han-Geurts IJM, Rempe-Sorm V, vander Mijnsbrugge GJH. 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with perianal fistulas: Comparison with 3D-anal ultrasound. BMC Gastroenterology. 2018;18(1):4444. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0770-6. 23. Xu C, Zhao R, Conklin JL, et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome compared with healthy adults: A retrospective study in 79 cases. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2014;26(6):621-9. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000000059. 24. Li Y, Yang X, Xu C, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Normal values and pressure morphology for threedimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry of asymptomatic adults: A study in 110 subjects. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2013;28(8):1161-8. doi:10.1007/ s00384-013-1706-9. 25. Mion F, Garros A, Brochard C, et al. 3D High-definition anorectal manometry: Values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD). Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2017;29(8). doi:10.1111/nmo.13049. 26. Carrington EV, Brokjær A, Craven H, et al. Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2014;26(5). doi:10.1111/nmo.12307. 27. Cuong LM, Van Quyet H, Hung TM, et al. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy young adults: evidence from Vietnam. BMC Gastroenterology. 2021;21(1). doi:10.1186/s12876-021-01865-8.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw