3 Systematic review of treatment efficacy of PFPT 73 Study Design/N Population/ Mean age SD/ range) Interventions/Duration Outcome Measures (muscle tone/ function, pain, sexual function, pelvic floor symptoms, QoL, PPE) Results Cervantes QoL Pre-to post-treatment: Menopause Health (p<.001) Sexuality (p<.001) Couple relationship ns Physical ns Total Score (p<.001) PFPT vs control: Menopause Health ns Sexuality ns Couple relationship ns Physical ns Total Score ns Ghaderi et al.(2019) RCT N=64 Premenopausal women with dyspareunia PFPT: 34.9 (9.2) Controls: 35.7 (8.0) PFPT Explanation of pelvic anatomy and function PF digital palpation proprioception Manual techniques PF Intravaginal EGS (110Hz, 80ms) PF home exercises Modified Oxford -scale PFPT vs control: PF muscle strength: (p<.001) PF muscle endurance (p<.05) Control No treatment VAS pain PFPT vs control: (p<.05) Significant difference remains at 3-months followup 10 sessions in 3 months FSFI PFPT vs control: Desire (p<.05) Arousal (p<.05) Lubrication (p<.05) Orgasm (p<.05) Satisfaction (p<.05) Pain (p<.05) Total Score (p<.05) Table 2. Continued
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw