137 GPS’ PERSPECTIVES ABOUT REMOTE DERMATOLOGY CARE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC Responses to SAF-TSUQ The responding GPs were positive about training, communication, the use of, and interaction with the telemedicine platform (Figure 7.3). Almost all GPs would use the platform again (61/66, 92%) and recommend it to a colleague (53/66, 80%). Most GPs (42/66, 64%) found the training and explanation offered by the telemedicine organization as sufficient to be able to use the platform in their daily practice. However, one-third (21/66, 32%) of the GPs were not familiar with the options for additional or continuing education offered by the telemedicine organization. Overall, the results of the SAF-TSUQ show opportunities for improvement regarding interaction with the platform (e.g., missing functionalities or the lack of knowledge about how to rectify or avoid mistakes). Notably, more than one-third (24/66, 36%) of GPs disagreed that the digital dermatology care provided with the telemedicine platform can be considered as a replacement of an inperson dermatology consultation. 7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw