156 CHAPTER 7 34. Jiang SW, Flynn MS, Kwock JT, Liu B, Quow K, Blanchard SK, et al. Quality and perceived usefulness of patient-submitted store-and-forward teledermatology images. JAMA Dermatol 2022;158(10):1183-1186. 35. Damsin T, Canivet G, Jacquemin P, Seidel L, Gillet P, Giet D, et al. Value of teledermoscopy in primary healthcare centers: preliminary results of the TELESPOT project in Belgium. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2020;10(6):1405-1413. 36. Börve A, Dahlén Gyllencreutz J, Terstappen K, Johansson Backman E, Aldenbratt A, Danielsson M, et al. Smartphone teledermoscopy referrals: a novel process for improved triage of skin cancer patients. Acta Derm Venereol 2015;95(2):186-190. 37. Jones L, Jameson M, Oakley A. Remote skin cancer diagnosis: adding images to electronic referrals is more efficient than wait-listing for a nurse-led imaging clinic. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(22):5828. 38. Dahlén Gyllencreutz J, Johansson Backman E, Terstappen K, Paoli J. Teledermoscopy images acquired in primary health care and hospital settings - a comparative study of image quality. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018;32(6):1038-1043. 39. Massone C, Maak D, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Soyer HP, Frühauf J. Teledermatology for skin cancer prevention: an experience on 690 Austrian patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014;28(8):1103-1108. 40. Houwink E, Chavannes N, Kramer A. E-healthonderwijs is een nieuwe uitdaging voor de huisartsopleiding. Huisarts Wet 2021;64(7):19-22. 41. van der Heijden JP, Thijssing L, Witkamp L, Spuls PI, de Keizer NF. Accuracy and reliability of teledermatoscopy with images taken by general practitioners during everyday practice. J Telemed Telecare 2013;19(6):320-325. 42. European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME) homepage. European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME). URL: https:// eaccme.uems.eu/home.aspx [accessed 2023-02-21]. 43. Janda M, Horsham C, Koh U, Gillespie N, Vagenas D, Loescher LJ, et al. Evaluating healthcare practitioners’ views on store-and-forward teledermoscopy services for the diagnosis of skin cancer. Digit Health 2019;5:2055207619828225. 44. Ogbechie OA, Nambudiri VE, Vleugels RA. Teledermatology perception differences between urban primary care physicians and dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol 2015;151(3):339-340. 45. Vestergaard T, Andersen MK, Bygum A. Acceptance of teledermoscopy by general practitioners and dermatologists in Denmark. Dermatol Pract Concept 2021;11(2):e2021033. 46. Deda LC, Goldberg RH, Jamerson TA, Lee I, Tejasvi T. Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine. NPJ Digit Med 2022;5(1):55. 47. Koh U, Betz-Stablein B, O’Hara M, Horsham C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, Soyer HP, et al. Development of a checklist tool to assess the quality of skin lesion images acquired by consumers using sequential mobile teledermoscopy. Dermatology 2022;238(1):27-34. 48. Vodrahalli K, Daneshjou R, Novoa RA, Chiou A, Ko JM, Zou J. TrueImage: a machine learning algorithm to improve the quality of telehealth photos. Pac Symp Biocomput 2021;26:220-231. 49. Su MY, Trefrey BL, Smith GP, Das S. Online portal-based system for improving patientgenerated photographs for teledermatology. Dermatol Ther 2020;33(6):e14453.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw