136 Chapter 5 Table 5.1. Participants categorised by educator phenotype in Phase 1; demographic data at the time of Phase 1; occurrence of maturation; educator phenotype in Phase 2. Educator phenotype in Phase 1 Case number Faculty Gender (m/f) Teaching experience (yrs) Topic/ task Maturation Educator phenotype in Phase 2 I. Inspirer S02 SUSM m 15 Clinical = S04 SUSM f 10 Clinical = S05 SUSM m # Administrative = S07 SUSM m 15 Basic science = S08 SUSM f 15 Clinical = S10 SUSM f 19 Administrative = S11 SUSM m 38 Administrative = S13 SUSM m 25 Clinical = Mean 20 II. Role model L01 LUMC f # Administrative Left academia L04 LUMC m 10 Clinical + Inspirer L05 LUMC m 13 Basic science = L06 LUMC f 5 Clinical Left academia L08 LUMC m 25 Clinical = L10 LUMC f 16 Basic science = L12 LUMC m 25 Basic science = L13 LUMC m 25 Administrative = S01 SUSM m 40 Basic science + Inspirer Mean 20 III. Practitioner L03 LUMC m 20 Clinical = L09 LUMC m 25 Basic science + Role model S06 SUSM m 19 Basic science = Mean 21 IV. Critic L02 LUMC m 10 Clinical + Role model S03 SUSM m 24 Basic science + Practitioner S12 SUSM m 32 Clinical + Role model Mean 22 LUMC = Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands; SUSM = Stanford University School of Medicine, USA; + = maturation occurred between Phase 1 and Phase 2; ‘=’ = participant kept the same educator phenotype as in Phase 1; # = missing value.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw