The initiation of Dutch newly qualified hospital-based midwives in practice, a qualitative study | 63 28. Aitink M, Goodarzi B, Martijn L. Beroepsprofiel verloskundige. Koninklijke Nederlandse Organisatie van Verloskundigen (KNOV); 2014. 29. Gottfreðsdóttir H, Nieuwenhuijze MJ. Midwifery education: Challenges for the future in a dynamic environment. Midwifery. 2018;59:78-80. 30. Kenens RJ, Batenburg R, Kasteleijn A. Cijfers uit de registratie van verloskundigen: Peiling 2016. . 2017. 31. Cronie D, Rijnders M, Buitendijk S. Diversity in the scope and practice of hospital‐ based midwives in the netherlands. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2012;57(5):469-475. 32. Henshaw A, Clarke D, Long AF. Midwives and supervisors of midwives' perceptions of the statutory supervision of midwifery within the united kingdom: A systematic review. Midwifery. 2013;29(1):75-85. 33. Mason J, Davies S. A qualitative evaluation of a preceptorship programme to support newly qualified midwives. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2013;11(3):94-98. 34. Adamson C, Beddoe L, Davys A. Building resilient practitioners: Definitions and practitioner understandings. British Journal of Social Work. 2014;44(3):522-541. 35. De Vries R, Nieuwenhuijze M, Buitendijk SE, Members of Midwifery Science Work Group. What does it take to have a strong and independent profession of midwifery? lessons from the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013;29(10):1122-1128. 36. Feijen-de Jong EI, Kool L, Peters LL, Jansen DE. Perceptions of nearly graduated fourth year midwifery students regarding a ‘good midwife’in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2017;50:157-162. 37. Butler MM, Fraser DM, Murphy RJ. What are the essential competencies required of a midwife at the point of registration? Midwifery. 2008;24(3):260-269. 38. Hughes AJ, Fraser DM. ‘SINK or SWIM’: The experience of newly qualified midwives in England. Midwifery. 2011;27(3):382-386.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw