303 References 325. Kadota K, Yeh YC, Sima CS, et al. The cribriform pattern identifies a subset of acinar predominant tumors with poor prognosis in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma: A conceptual proposal to classify cribriform predominant tumors as a distinct histologic subtype. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(5):690-700. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2013.188 326. Nakajima N, Yoshizawa A, Rokutan-Kurata M, et al. Prognostic significance of cribriform adenocarcinoma of the lung: validation analysis of 1,057 Japanese patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma and a review of the literature. Transl lung cancer Res. 2021;10(1):117127. doi:10.21037/tlcr-20-612 327. Kamiya K, Hayashi Y, Douguchi J, et al. Histopathological features and prognostic significance of the micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(8):992-1001. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2008.79 328. Pyo JS, Kim JH. Clinicopathological Significance of Micropapillary Pattern in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2018;24(3):547-555. doi:10.1007/s12253-017-0274-7 329. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/ American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: International multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma - An executive summary. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011;8(5):381-385. doi:10.1513/pats.201107-042ST 330. Butter R, Halfwerk H, Radonic T, Lissenberg-Witte B, Thunnissen E. The impact of impaired tissue fixation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer on protein deterioration and DNA degradation. Lung Cancer. 2023;178(January):108-115. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.02.007 331. Kadota K, Villena-Vargas J, Yoshizawa A, et al. Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung in patients with stage I disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(4):448-460. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000134 332. Thunnissen E, Beliën JAM, Kerr KM, et al. In compressed lung tissue microscopic sections of adenocarcinoma in situ may mimic papillary adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137(12):1792-1797. doi:10.5858/arpa.2012-0613-SA 333. Shin SS, Sasano H, Kristiansen G et al. Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Breast Tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021. (WHO Classification of Tumours Series, 5th Ed.; Vol. 2). Available from: Https://Tu.; 2022. 334. Suzuki K, Yokose T, Yoshida J, et al. Prognostic significance of the size of central fibrosis in peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(3):893-897. doi:10.1016/ S0003-4975(99)01331-4 335. Bittar HE, Jerome JA, Hartman D, Pantanowitz L, Mehrad M, Dacic S. Prognostic significance of microscopic size in peripherally located scar-associated clinical stage I lung carcinomas. Lung Cancer. 2020;143(February):12-18. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.03.004 336. Yambayev I, Sullivan TB, Suzuki K, et al. Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas of Low Malignant Potential: Proposed Criteria to Expand the Spectrum beyond Adenocarcinoma in Situ and Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021;45(4):567-576. doi:10.1097/ PAS.0000000000001618 337. Zugazagoitia J, Enguita AB, Nuñez JA, Iglesias L, Ponce S. The new IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification from a clinical perspective: Current concepts and future prospects. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S526-S536. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.01.27 338. Krishnamoorthy K, Lee M. Improved tests for the equality of normal coefficients of variation. Comput Stat. 2014;29(1-2):215-232. doi:10.1007/s00180-013-0445-2 339. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1121-1134. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121 A
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw