156 Chapter 6 78. Rozario T, DeSimone DW. The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: a dynamic view. Dev Biol 2010: 341(1): 126140. 79. Schmeichel KL, Bissell MJ. Modeling tissuespecific signaling and organ function in three dimensions. J Cell Sci 2003: 116(Pt 12): 2377-2388. 80. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005: 310(5751): 1139-1143. 81. Liu F, Mih JD, Shea BS, Kho AT, Sharif AS, Tager AM, Tschumperlin DJ. Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression. J Cell Biol 2010: 190(4): 693-706. 82. Chiquet M, Gelman L, Lutz R, Maier S. From mechanotransduction to extracellular matrix gene expression in fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009: 1793(5): 911-920. 83. Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014: 15(12): 802-812. 84. Huveneers S, Danen EH. Adhesion signaling - crosstalk between integrins, Src and Rho. J Cell Sci 2009: 122(Pt 8): 1059-1069. 85. Ingber DE. Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2008: 97(2-3): 163-179. 86. Tschumperlin DJ. Matrix, mesenchyme, and mechanotransduction. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015: 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S24-29. 87. Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science 2009: 326(5957): 1216-1219. 88. Rilla K, Mustonen AM, Arasu UT, Härkönen K, Matilainen J, Nieminen P. Extracellular vesicles are integral and functional components of the extracellular matrix. Matrix Biol 2019: 75-76: 201-219. 89. Pampaloni F, Reynaud EG, Stelzer EH. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007: 8(10): 839-845. 90. Ghodbane SA, Dunn MG. Physical and mechanical properties of cross-linked type I collagen scaffolds derived from bovine, porcine, and ovine tendons. J Biomed Mater Res A 2016: 104(11): 2685-2692. 91. Patil PP, Reagan MR, Bohara RA. Silk fibroin and silk-based biomaterial derivatives for ideal wound dressings. Int J Biol Macromol 2020: 164: 4613-4627. 92. Kanta J. Collagen matrix as a tool in studying fibroblastic cell behavior. Cell Adh Migr 2015: 9(4): 308-316. 93. Castillo-Briceno P, Bihan D, Nilges M, Hamaia S, Meseguer J, Garcia-Ayala A, Farndale RW, Mulero V. A role for specific collagen motifs during wound healing and inflammatory response of fibroblasts in the teleost fish gilthead seabream. Mol Immunol 2011: 48(6-7): 826-834. 94. Wang L, Zhao Y, Yang F, Feng M, Zhao Y, Chen X, Mi J, Yao Y, Guan D, Xiao Z, Chen B, Dai J. Biomimetic collagen biomaterial induces in situ lung regeneration by forming functional alveolar. Biomaterials 2020: 236: 119825. 95. Hamilton NJI, Hynds RE, Gowers KHC, Tait A, Butler CR, Hopper C, Burns AJ, Birchall MA, Lowdell M, Janes SM. Using a ThreeDimensional Collagen Matrix to Deliver Respiratory Progenitor Cells to Decellularized Trachea In Vivo. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2019: 25(2): 93-102.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw