102 Chapter 4 OHPs stated that the intervention is comparable to their normal way of working, but a helpful tool to conduct consultations and to reassure that all steps are performed. Both OHPs and participants were positive about the visual materials of the intervention, as it was a useful tool to discuss and identify problems on different life domains. However, OHPs stated that they mainly used the visual map to discuss problems (see image 1). The other materials were perceived too difficult for lower SEP workers, as these contained writing assignments and relied too much on problem-solving skills. Image 1. Visual map The intervention was perceived useful by most participants and OHPs, as the intervention could have positive effects on health, sick leave or functioning of workers, which was also presented in the results of the checklists (see table 5). In contrast, some other OHPs mentioned it is uncertain whether the intervention leads to positive effects. However, both participants and OHPs mentioned the intervention increased workers’ awareness of their health and own role in solving problems, which motivates them to reflect on what they themselves can do to improve their health, as was described by an OHP: OHP7: Well, I think that this method helps people to become aware of what they could change. Initially to become aware of it, to become self-conscious of what I actually
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw