Rosanne Schaap

153 Context analysis of interventions among lower socioeconomic position employees 16. Nielsen K, Fredslund H, Christensen KB, Albertsen K. Success or failure? Interpreting and understanding the impact of interventions in four similar worksites. Work & Stress. 2006;20(3):272–87. 17. Green LW. Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96(3):406–9. 18. Thorlindsson T. Bring in the social context: Towards an integrated approach to health promotion and prevention. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2011;39(6):19–25. 19. Checklist voor een basiscontract voor arbodienstverlening. OVAL; 2018 [Available from: https://www.oval.nl/cms/public/files/2018-08/1535526303_checklistbasiscontract-arbodienstverlening-versie-juli-2018.pdf?7cfbd1ffbd]. 20. Van der Kemp SA, van der Zeijden PT. De markt en kwaliteit van arbodienstverlening. Panteia; 2014. 21. Douwes M, van Genabeek JA, van den Bossche SN, van Dam L, Eysink P, Fernandez Beiro L, et al. Arbobalans 2016. Kwaliteit van de arbeid, effecten en maatregelen in Nederland. Leiden: TNO; 2016. 22. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. 23. Hosper K, Loenen T. Leven met ongezonde stress: Aandacht voor chronische stress in de aanpak van gezondheidsverschillen. Utrecht: Pharos; 2021. 24. Sakowski P, Marcinkiewicz A. Health promotion and prevention in occupational health systems in Europe. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2019;32(3):353–61. 25. Rantanen J, Lehtinen S, Valenti A, Iavicoli S. A global survey on occupational health services in selected international commission on occupational health (ICOH) member countries. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):787. 26. Bakker RH, Krol B, van der Gulden JW, Groothoff JW. Arbocuratieve samenwerking: een vergelijking van de taken en positie van de bedrijfsarts in vier landen. TSGTijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen. 2005;83(5):257–64. 27. Vuorenkoski L, Mladovsky P, Mossialos E. Finland: Health system review. Health System in Transition. 2008;10(4):1–168. 28. De Kock CA, Lucassen PL, Spinnewijn L, Knottnerus JA, Buijs PC, Steenbeek R, et al. How do Dutch GPs address work-related problems? A focus group study. European Journal of General Practice. 2016;22(3):169–75. 29. KNMG-Visie document Zorg die werkt. Naar een betere arbeidsgerichte medische zorg voor (potentieel) werkenden. Utrecht: KNMG; 2017. 30. Verger P, Ménard C, Richard J-B, Demortière G, Beck F. Collaboration between general practitioners and occupational physicians: a comparison of the results of two national surveys in France. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2014;56(2):209–13. 31. Moßhammer D, Natanzon I, Manske I, Grutschkowski P, Rieger MA. Cooperation between general practitioners and occupational health physicians in Germany: how can it be optimised? A qualitative study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2014;87(2):137–46. 32. Letrilliart L, Barrau A. Difficulties with the sickness certification process in general practice and possible solutions: a systematic review. European Journal of General Practice. 2012;18(4):219–28. 33. Buijs P, Gunnyeon B, van Weel C. Primary health care: what role for occupational health? British Journal of General Practice. 2012;62(605):623–4 5

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw