Rosanne Schaap

221 Training for supervisors to guide employees with a work disability Implementation process of ‘Mentorwijs’ (aim 4) In this study a total of 19 ‘Mentorwijs’ trainings that each consisted of five meetings were evaluated. The intervention was delivered to groups, ranging from 5-18 supervisors in one training. The majority of the trainings (n=14) took place at municipal organizations or at the workplaces of supervisors (Table 6). Five trainings took place online due to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Most supervisors (73%) participated in all 5 meetings of a single training and the training was on average evaluated as satisfying (mean satisfaction score ranging from 4.4 to 4.7 (on a scale from 1-5). Between 25 and 31% of the supervisors indicated they spend on average 4-7 hours extra time on the guidance of employees with a work disability after completion of the training. The majority of supervisors rated almost all contextual factors a high score. The supervisors rated feedback and formal endorsement from their own organization lower, as compared to other contextual factors. Table 6. Process evaluation measures Process evaluation outcomes Mean (SD)/% Dose delivered Training at municipal organization or at workplace 74% Online training 26% Dose received Participated in 5 meetings of a training 73% Participated in 4 meetings of a training 18% Participated in 3 meetings of a training 7% Participated in 2 meetings of a training 0% Participated in 1 meeting 1% Extra time spent on guidance Guidance of employees takes more time (yes) T1 = 25% T2 = 31% T3 = 26% Number of hours per week spent extra on guidance T1 = 6.6 (8.3) T2 = 5.5 (4.8) T3 = 4.7 (3.9) Satisfaction Satisfaction in general 4.4 (0.6) Satisfaction meetings 4.4 (0.5) Satisfaction trainer(s) 4.7 (0.9) Satisfaction content of the training 4.4 (0.9) Satisfaction teaching methods of the training 4.4 (0.9) Satisfaction structure and duration of the training 4.4 (0.9) 7

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw