32 Chapter 2 Table 2. Study characteristics Author, publication year and country Population (dataset, cohort or register, n, sex, and age) Design (type and follow-up period) Statistical analyses (stratification and/or interaction term) Quality assessment score Laaksonen et al., 2012 Finland (46) National register data of the Finnish Centre for Pensions n=7,005 No data on sex Mean age 53.5 (SD 7.5) Prospective Follow-up 10 years Interaction term; exit from work with occupational level 100% Latif, 2013 Canada (36) NPHS n=12,947 Male 48% Mean age 65.5 (no data on range and SD) Prospective Follow-up 18 years Stratification; educational level 89% Mein et al., 2003 England (37) Whitehall II study n=1,010 Male 64% No data on mean age (range 54-59) Prospective Follow-up 3 years Stratification; occupational level 67% Moon et al., 2012 United States (38) HRS n=5,422 Male 46% Mean age 58.0 (SD 5.7) Prospective Follow-up 10 years Stratification; educational level Interaction term; exit from work with educational level 89% Olesen et al., 2015 Denmark (47) Register-based Labor Force Statistics and the DREAM n=245,082 Male 51% Mean age 61.8 (range 60-68) Prospective Follow-up 6 years Stratification; educational level 100%
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw