Moving beyond Gender Identity 201 7 References: 1. White, J., Tannenbaum, C., Klinge, I., Schiebinger, L. & Clayton, J. The Integration of Sex and Gender Considerations Into Biomedical Research: Lessons From International Funding Agencies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 106, 3034–3048 (2021). 2. Madsen, T. E. et al. Sex- and Gender-Based Medicine: The Need for Precise Terminology. Gender and the Genome 1, 122–128 (2017). 3. Pelletier, R., Ditto, B. & Pilote, L. A composite measure of gender and its association with risk factors in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome. Psychosom. Med. 77, 517–526 (2015). 4. Nielsen, M. W. et al. Gender-related variables for health research. Biol. Sex Differ. 12, 1–16 (2021). 5. Göttgens, I., Darweesh, S. K. L., Bloem, B. R. & Oertelt-Prigione, S. The impact of multiple gender dimensions on health-related quality of life in persons with Parkinson’s disease: an exploratory study. J. Neurol. (2022) doi:10.1007/s00415-022-11228-2. 6. Oertelt-Prigione, S. et al. Sex-differences in symptoms and functioning in >5000 cancer survivors: Results from the PROFILES registry. Eur. J. Cancer 156, 24–34 (2021). 7. Horstmann, S., Schmechel, C., Palm, K., Oertelt-Prigione, S. & Bolte, G. The Operationalisation of Sex and Gender in Quantitative Health-Related Research: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, (2022). 8. Wilson, T., Holt, T. & Greenhalgh, T. Complexity science: complexity and clinical care. BMJ 323, 685–688 (2001). 9. Greenhalgh, T. Will COVID-19 be evidence-based medicine’s nemesis? PLoS Med. 17, e1003266 (2020). 10. Greenhalgh, T. & Papoutsi, C. Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift. BMC Med. 16, 95 (2018).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw