The Salience of Gender 95 4 References 1. GBD 2016 Parkinson’s Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 17, 939–953 (2018). 2. Dorsey, E. R., Sherer, T., Okun, M. S. & Bloem, B. R. The Emerging Evidence of the Parkinson Pandemic. J. Parkinsons. Dis. 8, S3–S8 (2018). 3. Soundy, A., Stubbs, B. & Roskell, C. The experience of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. ScientificWorldJournal 2014, 613592 (2014). 4. Haaxma, C. A. et al. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 78, 819–824 (2007). 5. Picillo, M. et al. The relevance of gender in Parkinson’s disease: a review. J. Neurol. 264, 1583–1607 (2017). 6. Balash, Y., Korczyn, A. D., Migirov, A. A. & Gurevich, T. Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A genderspecific perspective. Acta Neurol. Scand. 140, 17–22 (2019). 7. Crispino, P. et al. Gender Differences and Quality of Life in Parkinson ’ s Disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2021). 8. Göttgens, I., Darweesh, S. K. L., Bloem, B. R. & Oertelt-Prigione, S. The impact of multiple gender dimensions on health-related quality of life in persons with Parkinson’s disease: an exploratory study. J. Neurol. (2022) doi:10.1007/s00415-022-11228-2. 9. Solimeo, S. Sex and gender in older adults’ experience of Parkinson’s disease. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 63, S42-8 (2008). 10. Levine, R. M. Identity and illness: The effects of identity salience and frame of reference on evaluation of illness and injury. Br. J. Health Psychol. 4, 63–80 (1999). 11. Rohmer, O. & Louvet, E. Describing persons with disability: salience of disability, gender, and ethnicity. Rehabil. Psychol. 54, 76–82 (2009). 12. Carter, M. J. Gender Socialization and Identity Theory. Soc. Sci. 3, 242–263 (2014). 13. Speer, S. A. & Stokoe, E. Conversation and Gender. (Cambridge University Press, 2011). 14. Starr, C. R. & Zurbriggen, E. L. Sandra Bem’s Gender Schema Theory After 34 Years: A Review of its Reach and Impact. Sex Roles 76, (2017). 15. Ypinga, J. H. L. et al. Rationale and design to evaluate the PRIME Parkinson care model : a prospective observational evaluation of proactive , integrated and patient ‑ centred Parkinson care in The Netherlands ( PRIME ‑ NL ). BMC Neurol. 1–11 (2021). 16. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. & Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 19, 349–357 (2007). 17. Weller, S. C. et al. Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS One 13, e0198606 (2018). 18. Guest, G., Namey, E. & Chen, M. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS One 15, e0232076 (2020). 19. Butler, J. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution : An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40, 519–531 (1988). 20. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual. Res. Psychol. 18, 328–352 (2021). 21. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw