75 Pre-Radiotherapy Cognitive Profiles in Patients with Brain Metastases 33. Israelashvili J, Sauter D, Fischer A. Two facets of affective empathy: concern and distress have opposite relationships to emotion recognition. Cogn Emot 2020; 34: 1112–1122. 34. Hänggi Y. Stress and emotion recognition: An Internet experiment using stress induction. Swiss Journal of Psychology 2004; 63: 113–125. 35. Buunk AM, Gerritsen MJJ, Jeltema HR, et al. Emotion Recognition in Patients with Low-Grade Glioma before and after Surgery. Brain Sci; 12. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091259. 36. Chen P, Wang G, Ma R, et al. Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities in patients with insular glioma. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2016; 16: 962–975. 37. Goebel S, Mehdorn HM, Wiesner CD. Social cognition in patients with intracranial tumors: do we forget something in the routine neuropsychological examination? J Neurooncol 2018; 140: 687–696. 38. Campanella F, Shallice T, Ius T, et al. Impact of brain tumour location on emotion and personality: A voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study on mentalization processes. Brain 2014; 137: 2532–2545. 39. John Hugh Court, Raven J. Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 7, Research and References: Summaries of Published Normative Studies, Reliability Studies, Validity Studies, References to All Sections of the Manual. Oxford Psychologists. 40. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV-NL) Technische handleiding. 2013. 41. Bouma A, Mulder J, Lindeboom J SB. Handboek neuropsychologische diagnostiek. Amsterdam: Pearson, 2012. 42. Drane DL, Yuspeh RL, Huthwaite JS, et al. Demographic characteristics and normative observations for derived-Trail Making Test indices. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 2002; 15: 39–43. 43. D.C. Delis EK, Kramer. JH. D-KEFS Color Word Interference Test, Nederlandse bewerking door I. Noens en van der I. Berckelaer-Onnes. 44. Harrison JE, Buxton P, Husain M, et al. Short test of semantic and phonological fluency: Normal performance, validity and test-retest reliability. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2000; 39: 181–191. 45. Schmand B, Groenink SC, Van Den Dungen M. Letterfluency: Psychometric properties and Dutch normative data. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie 2008; 39: 64–76. 46. Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, et al. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised: Normative Data and Analysis of Inter-Form and Test-Retest Reliability. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1998, pp. 43–55. 47. Brandt J, Ralph H B Benedict. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised Professional Manual. 48. Tremblay MP, Potvin O, Callahan BL, et al. Normative data for the rey-osterrieth and the taylor complex figure tests in Quebec-French people. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2015; 30: 78–87. 49. Lindeboom J, Schmand B, Meyer S, et al. Visual Association Test Manual. 50. Van Der Elst W, Van Boxtel MPJ, Van Breukelen GJP, et al. Normative data for the Animal, Profession and Letter M Naming verbal fluency tests for Dutch speaking participants and the effects of age, education, and sex. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 80–89. 51. Grooved Pegboard Test User Instructions. 3
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw