24 Chapter 1 1 Strategies in Games for Behaviour Change. IEEE Transactions on Games. 2022:1-. 35. Visch V, Vegt N, Anderiesen H, van der kooij K. Persuasive Game Design: A model and its definitions2013. 36. Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop. Journal of medical Internet research. 2017;19(6):e232. 37. Duplaga M. The association between Internet use and health-related outcomes in older adults and the elderly: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2021;21(1):150. 38. Svendsen MT, Bak CK, Sørensen K, Pelikan J, Riddersholm SJ, Skals RK, et al. Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status: a large national population-based survey among Danish adults. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):565. 39. Brørs G, Norman CD, Norekvål TM. Accelerated importance of eHealth literacy in the COVID-19 outbreak and beyond. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2020;19(6):458-61. 40. Triana AJ, Gusdorf RE, Shah KP, Horst SN. Technology Literacy as a Barrier to Telehealth During COVID-19. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020;26(9):1118-9. 41. Eruchalu CN, Pichardo MS, Bharadwaj M, Rodriguez CB, Rodriguez JA, Bergmark RW, et al. The Expanding Digital Divide: Digital Health Access Inequities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City. Journal of Urban Health. 2021;98(2):183-6. 42. World Health O. Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable: report of the third global survey on eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 2016. 43. World Health O. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 2021. 44. Van Dijk JAGM. Digital Divide: Impact of Access. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects2017. p. 1-11. 45. Osborne R, Kayser L. Skills and characteristics of the e-health literate patient. Bmj. 2018;361:k1656. 46. Cheng C, Beauchamp A, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Applying the Electronic Health Literacy Lens: Systematic Review of Electronic Health Interventions Targeted at Socially Disadvantaged Groups. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22(8):e18476. 47. Faber JS, Al-Dhahir I, Reijnders T, Chavannes NH, Evers AWM, Kraal JJ, et al. Attitudes Toward Health, Healthcare, and eHealth of People With a Low Socioeconomic Status: A Community-Based Participatory Approach. (2673-253X (Electronic)). 48. Al-Dhahir IA-O, Reijnders TA-O, Faber JA-O, van den Berg-Emons RA-O, Janssen VAO, Kraaijenhagen RA-O, et al. The Barriers and Facilitators of eHealth-Based Lifestyle Intervention Programs for People With a Low Socioeconomic Status: Scoping Review. (1438-8871 (Electronic)). 49. Nind M. Conducting Qualitative Research with People with Learning, Communication and Other Disabilities: Methodological Challenges. 2008. 50. Millum J, Campbell M, Luna F, Malekzadeh A, Karim QA. Ethical challenges in global healthrelated stigma research. BMC Medicine. 2019;17(1):84.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw