292 9 Chapter 9 53. Holbrook AM, Thabane L Fau - Shcherbatykh IY, Shcherbatykh Iy Fau - O’Reilly D, O’Reilly D. E-health interventions as complex interventions: improving the quality of methods of assessment. (1942-597X (Electronic)). 54. Burns TW, O’Connor DJ, Stocklmayer SM. Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition. Public Understanding of Science. 2003;12(2):183-202. 55. Fecher B, Hebing M. How do researchers approach societal impact? PLOS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254006. 56. Goldstein CM, Murray EJ, Beard J, Schnoes AM, Wang ML. Science Communication in the Age of Misinformation. (1532-4796 (Electronic)). 57. Grant J. Academic Incentives and Research Impact: Developing Reward and Recognition Systems to Better People’s Lives. 2021. 58. Schalet A, Tropp L, Troy L. Making Research Usable Beyond Academic Circles: A Relational Model of Public Engagement. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2020;20. 59. van der Meulen B, Rip A. Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands. Research Evaluation. 2000;9(1):11-25. 60. VSNU N, KNAW, NWO, and ZonMw. Room for everyone’s talent towards a new balance in the recognition and rewards of academics. 2020.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw