Chapter 6 184 adolescents perceived more parental warmth and autonomy support on days they also experienced more positive affect (rs ≥ .18, p < .001) and less negative affect (rs ≤ -.13, p < .001). More parental psychological control and strictness correlated with less positive affect (rs ≤ -.11, ps < .001) and more negative affect (rs = .16, ps < .001) within families. More parental monitoring correlated with more same-day positive affect (r = .06, p = .003) but not with less negative affect (r = .00, p = .823). Compared to these average within-family correlations, between-family correlations were similar in sign, but stronger in magnitude. Table 1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations (N = 129) Descriptive statistics Correlations M SD ICC 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Parenting dimension 1. Warmth 83.34 17.02 .56 - .39*** -.33*** -.30*** .00 .32*** -.23*** 2. Autonomy support 74.61 23.99 .55 .64*** - -.26*** -.26*** .07** .18*** -.13*** 3. Psy. control 6.77 11.93 .62 -.42*** -.41*** - .42*** .06* -.12*** .16*** 4. Strictness 13.08 21.33 .60 -.37*** -.37*** .64*** - .10*** -.11*** .16*** 5. Monitoring 21.61 29.76 .59 -.16* -.13 .28*** .52*** - .06* .00 Adolescent affect 6. Positive affect 76.27 20.93 .64 .46*** .39** -.11 -.19* -.09 - -.50*** 7. Negative affect 11.11 15.17 .49 -.36*** -.33*** .39*** .49*** .20* -.66*** - Note. M = sample mean. SD = standard deviation. ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient. Psy. control = psychological control. All items ranged from 0 – 100. Within-family correlations are presented above the diagonal and between-family correlations under the diagonal. *** p ≤ .001, ** p < .01, * p < .05 Family-Specific Temporal Network Models Rather than focusing on the average within-family associations in this study, it was examined how individual families function. The data were well-suited to assess these dynamics: 127 of 129 family-specific network models showed excellent model fit, according to the mean RMSEA = 0.04 (range:0.00-0.10), SRMR = .07 (range: .04 - .15), CFI = .97 (range:0.95 – 1.00), and NNFI = .99 (range:0.92 – 1.00). Two family-specific networks that failed to achieve a satisfactory model fit (RMSEA ≥ 0.11, SRMR ≥ 0.08, CFIs ≤ 0.93, NNFI ≤ 0.88) were removed from the subsequent analyses. Associations Shared by All Families (Group Level) Before answering the research question about the existence of subgroup dynamics, it was explored whether ‘group-level’ associations existed, i.e., those that were estimated
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw