6 Like no other? 187 were next-day associations. On average, the families displayed 2.4 parenting-affect associations (SD = 1.3, range = 1-7). Parenting-affect associations accounted for 9% to 75% of the total associations in the family-specific networks (excluding autoregressive effects). To provide more in-depth insights into these family-specific dynamics, the parenting-affect associations found at the individual level were elaborated upon. As summarized in Table 2, each of the five parenting practices was associated with adolescents’ affective well-being across families. However, which parenting practices were related to adolescent positive or negative affect, how strong, and at which timescale (i.e., same-day and/or next-day) were heterogeneous across families. To illustrate, the association shared by the greatest number of families was a positive same-day association between parental warmth and adolescent positive affect, found in 49 families. All other parenting-affect associations were shared by a maximum of 17 families, with several associations detected in only a handful of families. Thus, although parenting practices were associated with adolescent affective well-being in almost all families, which practices were associated with the adolescent’s affective well-being was family specific. Table 2 Number of Families with Same-day and Next-day Associations between Parenting Practices and Adolescent Affect Same-day Next-day - + - + Warmth with PA 2 49 1 14 Warmth with NA 25 1 3 5 Autonomy support with PA 0 17 2 7 Autonomy support with NA 11 3 3 4 Psychological control with PA 2 1 2 3 Psychological control with NA 2 12 3 7 Strictness with PA 8 8 4 2 Strictness with NA 2 21 3 4 Monitoring with PA 2 7 8 3 Monitoring with NA 2 5 2 5 Note. - = negative association. + = positive association. PA = positive affect. NA = negative affect. Some families were counted double if they had reciprocal same-day or next-day directed associations (e.g., warmth predicted PA the same day and vice versa). To further illustrate the idiographic nature of the daily dynamics between parenting practices and adolescents’ affective well-being, Figure 5 depicts the temporal networks of three individual families. In Family A, more positive affect predicted more parental warmth and
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw