Chapter 7 214 Table 3 Sample distribution of the sign (negative, null, or positive) of the standardized family-specific cross-lagged effects Adolescent functioning Parenting dimension Time scale Depressive symptoms Anxiety symptoms Negative affect Self-esteem Positive affect - 0 + - 0 + - 0 + - 0 + - 0 + Warmth Day P → A 21% 74% 5% 8% 26% 66% A → P 25% 55% 20% 9% 35% 55% 2W P → A 21% 51% 27% 55% 23% 22% 23% 33% 44% Aut. support Day P → A 18% 73% 9% 11% 45% 44% A → P 13% 75% 11% 8% 40% 53% Psy. control Day P → A 3% 72% 25% 37% 43% 20% A → P 17% 62% 21% 26% 61% 13% 2W P → A 1% 51% 47% 71% 19% 10% Beh. control Day P → A 10% 39% 51% 28% 49% 23% A → P 20% 71% 9% 13% 61% 26% Note. P → A: time-lagged effect from parenting to adolescent functioning. A → P: time-lagged effect from adolescent functioning to parenting. 2W: biweekly time interval. Daily data is from “100 days of my life” study (taverage = 91, N = 159). Bi-weekly data is from “One size does not fit all” (taverage = 18, N = 256). A negative (-) effect is β ≤ -.05. A null (0) effect is -.05 < β < .05. A positive (+) effect is β ≥ .05. Group size in bold is a majority in the given association. The here presented bivariate family-specific effects were estimated with Dynamic Structural Equation Modelling (see Chapters 4 & 5).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw