Chapter 1 28 co-existed in the sample by describing variation in family-specific bi-weekly effects of perceived parental support and psychological control on three aspects of adolescent psychological functioning. Furthermore, I tested whether adolescents with different responsivity patterns varied in their trait levels of environmental sensitivity. Figure 5 Overview of the empirically studied concepts in Chapters 3 to 6 Parenting Adolescent functioning Moderators: - Demographic characteristics (ch. 3, 5, 6) - Personality traits (ch. 3-6) - Psychological functioning (ch. 5, 6) - Legitimacy of parental authority (ch. 6) - Mean levels of perceived parenting (ch. 6) 1. Warmth (ch. 3-6) 2. Autonomy support (ch. 5, 6) 3. Behavioral control (ch. 5, 6) 4. Psychological control (ch. 4-6) 1. Depressive symptoms (3, 4) 2. Anxiety symptoms (ch. 4) 3. Negative affect (ch. 3, 5, 6) 4. Self-esteem (ch. 4) 5. Positive affect (ch. 5, 6) In Chapter 5, I zoomed into the potential heterogeneity in the directionality of the daily dynamics between parenting and adolescent functioning. By estimating family-specific cross-lagged effects between the four key dimensions of parenting and adolescent affective functioning, I described whether the direction (i.e., parent-driven, adolescentdriven, or reciprocal) of day-to-day effects were heterogeneous across families. Moreover, I tested whether several adolescent characteristics, including demographic characteristics and trait levels of environmental sensitivity and neuroticism, could explain heterogeneity in the strength of these family-specific effects.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw