GENERAL DISCUSSION 195 8 REFERENCES 1. Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki J, Mount SL. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(2):309-12. 2. Frumovitz M, Singh DK, Meyer L, Smith DH, Wertheim I, Resnik E, et al. Predictors of final histology in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(3):463-8. 3. Thomas S, Hussein Y, Bandyopadhyay S, Cote M, Hassan O, Abdulfatah E, et al. Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Uterine High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(8):836-43. 4. Visser NCM, Reijnen C, Massuger L, Nagtegaal ID, Bulten J, Pijnenborg JMA. Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):803-13. 5. Mota A, Colás E, García-Sanz P, Campoy I, Rojo-Sebastián A, Gatius S, et al. Genetic analysis of uterine aspirates improves the diagnostic value and captures the intra-tumor heterogeneity of endometrial cancers. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(1):134-45. 6. Lax SF, Kurman RJ, Pizer ES, Wu L, Ronnett BM. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24(9):1201-8. 7. Taylor RR, Zeller J, Lieberman RW, O’Connor DM. An analysis of two versus three grades for endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74(1):3-6. 8. Garg K, Soslow RA. Strategies for distinguishing low-grade endometrioid and serous carcinomas of endometrium. Adv Anat Pathol. 2012;19(1):1-10. 9. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12-39. 10. WHO classification of Tumours 5th ed2020 2020. 11. Gilks CB, Oliva E, Soslow RA. Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(6):874-81. 12. Han G, Sidhu D, Duggan MA, Arseneau J, Cesari M, Clement PB, et al. Reproducibility of histological cell type in high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(12):1594-604. 13. Nielsen AL, Thomsen HK, Nyholm HC. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the revised 1988 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grading system of endometrial cancers with special emphasis on nuclear grading. Cancer. 1991;68(10):2303-9. 14. Visser NCM, van der Wurff AAM, IntHout J, Reijnen C, Dabir PD, Soltani GG, et al. Improving preoperative diagnosis in endometrial cancer using systematic morphological assessment and a small immunohistochemical panel. Hum Pathol. 2021. 15. Perrone E, De Felice F, Capasso I, Distefano E, Lorusso D, Nero C, et al. The immunohistochemical molecular risk classification in endometrial cancer: A pragmatic and high-reproducibility method. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;165(3):585-93. 16. van der Putten LJM, Visser NCM, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, et al. Added Value of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression to Histology-Based Endometrial Carcinoma Recurrence Prediction Models: An ENITEC Collaboration Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(3):514-23. 17. Trovik J, Wik E, Werner HM, Krakstad C, Helland H, Vandenput I, et al. Hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in prospective multicentre trial. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(16):3431-41. 18. Kommoss FK, Karnezis AN, Kommoss F, Talhouk A, Taran FA, Staebler A, et al. L1CAM further stratifies endometrial carcinoma patients with no specific molecular risk profile. Br J Cancer. 2018;119(4):480-6.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk4NDMw